leggo:
Chelsea the defending EPL champions must have a nairaland thread, no?
its almost like the majority of the Nigerian fanbase is too busy to come online, seeing as the y are mostly motor park touts and rascals, the few who have internet privileges come here to troll.

Its funny how the plastic chelsick and goner fans prefer 2 spend all their time on the united thread either by making lame attempts at trolling or by actually learning how 2 banter about soccer, success and club prestige from those who have been used 2 it for eons! Its only sad that most of them are as dull as dish water and as insipid as mosquitoes if not they could actually have been a welcome distraction! I can't blame them though! You can't expect " a bloody group of chibok boys" to not get hard on's when they have been granted a means to associate with " the offspring of kings"! Its a privilege 4 most of them! Lol!!!

Guardiola said pedro is a very good player and if perhaps he's a brazilian he would've been pedrodinho and some top teams wouldn't have been able to purchase him, okay o
but why din't pep sign pedro instead of going for douglas costa douglas costa publicly declared his love for mourinho and chelsea football if i'm not mistaken, but pep signed him, now pep is showering praise on pedro and mourinho signed him, (fishy )
why din't pep signed pedro all this while cause there's no doubt he would be the better option to replace the ageing ribery cause he's a right footed player and plays the same position under pep @barca that ribery is also playing under pep,
did pep loose interest cause he thinks or knows that pedro has lost it, or the barca board won't sanction the sale or he's just not interested Someone should share some light.
raumdeuter, A40 you guys are needed.

Nihilist:


What is the relevance of your question to the initial exchange?

Elampiro: We didn't miss out on Clyne. Valencia would have benched him.
Nihilist: Valencia would have benched which Clyne? The one that has been a beast for Liverpool?

Leggo: Ivanovic has been poor for Chelsea.



I dont compute

It's overly possible that Valencia would have benched Clyne simply because different coaches have different choices of players. Mata was Chelshit's best player when MoaningHoe arrived and benched him cos he didn't fit in his football plans/patterns. Rafael is a better RB than Val, but Val benched him because Gaal prefers Val to Raf. Raf is no poor RB. Mata is a poor winger than Val, but Val is benched and Mata starts. It's all about a coach's choice. MaureenHoe benched Casillas, not every coach would do that.

Chelseafan1:

hehehe....I'm telling you, Sanchez go better pass am for my eye o....dt Sanchez na werey....correct baller wey get high work rate.

Thank you

See as Man Utd just SHINE shoe for Chelshit finish....
Scummies come dey get mouth...

Otamendi surely would have been ours if he was a LCB.. Van gal never went for him, so i wouldn't call him a miss. I think our youths like Januzaj, Pereira and Lingard should be given game times.. United is known as a youth grooming club unlike chelsea and city..

hensben:
my guy I nor go lie, Sanchez>>Pedro.

I think so too,but we didn't know Sanchez is a best until he arrived here ,let's see

bigkesh:
I think so too,but we didn't know Sanchez is a best until he arrived here ,let's see

you're right.

United fans complaining? just please
When the moronic ones among you guys kept disturbing our thread, there was no p....
Ejaculating and mourning over our results and buys......

Just close the mouth if you don't know how it all began

Awwww! Na Pedro una carry for head lai dis?? Nawa o! I even thought dey won league or something..... Issok!! Carry on pls

bigkesh:
Sadio Mane,Hell of a suprise

Mane is good

Antell95:

Mane is good

So is Moses

Tval:
Dopejemi, can you see this?

Shuoo! I be mod? Wetin you want make I do Tval

dopeJemi:


Shuoo! I be mod? Wetin you want make I do Tval

Ban am

......

Tval:
Ban am

I no be mod oh abeg

bigkesh:
So is Moses

that means?

Now, I believe the media don't have a clue of what goes on on the transfer market. The sun and the telegraph have a conflicting tales of the pedro's saga.. The sun says that LVG pulled the plug on pedro's deal while the telegraph reported that a phone call from mourinho and cesc made pedro change his mind. Now, which of these do we believe?

A kokorin is trying to get for himself a better transfer deal or an improved wage bills..

Antell95:

that means?

There are good players and there are very good players

But chelsea were the first in line to sign pedro before united came banging on the door. So why are some of the united faithfulls ranting so hard

I think with this Pedro saga ,our transfer business is sadly over in this window. Bayern can't sell muller when the transfer is already ending n neither will Athletico sell Grieazman if we bid for him or even mane ,Southampton wouldn't want to sell that one now as de lost key players this window also ,so I guess we r stuck with this set of players for now.

It was going well for Ed when he scored Darmian ,Tiger n Morgan within 4 days n den it went downhill from there ,wasting time chasing a Sergio Ramos that wanted a bigger pay at Madrid n a Muller who is a die hard Bavarian. And then LVG decided to play blind at Center half n it effectively ruled out the signing of Otamendi who we also had problems with his huge transfer fees. Then it was Pedro (or not) ,a player that wanted out of barca (hard to see this days) n we looked like the perfect bed partner as we struggled for firepower upfront ,we needed Pedro ,he was cheap n could hv strengthened the team but Ed didn't want to pay the full release clause ,thinking that united is d only way out for Pedro n soon Barca will bend its knee but then Chelsea bought the full release clause n now he is in London but what did Ed do to cover this mess? That's right , bid for Saido Mane immediately!! WTF? A cheap attempt to show the world dat he backed out first b4 Chelsea swooped in for the damsel in distress or was it a distressed damsel who was by that point in time pissed off by Ed's dilly dally on the transfer business, who won't be? It might look like Ed n LVG weren't too interested in Pedro but the reality is ... They fцcked up big time!.

My two kobo

It's funny how people are pained now only because Pedro joined our rival. If Chelsea had not bought him, many of you would still have been shouting we shouldn't buy because we will have association of midgets in our attack. Many rallied behind that opinion. Now they cry.

I guess I was the only one who firmly expressed interest from the start. Many of you guys said he played his last football under Guardiola and now he is finished.

Instead of cry and pains why don't we move on? He is coming to EPL, he might still flop.

elampiro:
It's funny how people are pained now only because Pedro joined our rival. If Chelsea had not bought him, many of you would still have been shouting we shouldn't buy because we will have association of midgets in our attack. Many rallied behind that opinion. Now they cry.

I guess I was the only one who firmly expressed interest from the start. Many of you guys said he played his last football under Guardiola and now he is finished.

Instead of cry and pains why don't we move on? He is coming to EPL, he might still flop.

I'm guessing this post is directed at me ,even if Pedro joined Juventus it will still be a blow to united ,this is a player we all thought was coming to united ,even the coach was praising the player as someone he needs in the team n then all of a sudden he joins Chelsea who if things work out well for united will be our rivals for the EPL trophy n d most disgraceful part of this business is that Ed was trying to play smart n failed woefully. This is not about if we were seriously interested in him we would hv paid in full,truth is we were n Pedro has already agreed to personal terms with us since last week so why the dilly dally? I will love to hear what LVG has to say about this in his pre match conference.

And yes he might flop like di maria but could also blossom like Sanchez

parrotibaba:
I'm guessing this post is directed at me ,even if Pedro joined Juventus it will still be a blow to united ,this is a player we all thought was coming to united ,even the coach was praising the player as someone he needs in the team n then all of a sudden he joins Chelsea who if things work out well for united will be our rivals for the EPL trophy n d most disgraceful part of this business is that Ed was trying to play smart n failed woefully. This is not about if we were seriously interested in him we would hv paid in full,truth is we were n Pedro has already agreed to personal terms with us since last week so why the dilly dally? I will love to hear what LVG has to say about this in his pre match conference.

And yes he might flop like di maria but could also blossom like Sanchez

I was just wondering if we now need association of midgets as our front men.

elampiro:


I was just wondering if we now need association of midgets as our front men.

I don't get this?

parrotibaba:
I don't get this?

Don't worry.

..............

But read this. United did not suddenly changed their mind.


The offer for the 23-year-old, who scored a hat-trick in a Premier League record time of two minutes 56 seconds against Aston Villa last season, was lodged last week.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/9956811/manchester-united-make-bid-for-southamptons-sadio-mane

elampiro:


Don't worry.

..............

But read this. United did not suddenly changed their mind.


The offer for the 23-year-old, who scored a hat-trick in a Premier League record time of two minutes 56 seconds against Aston Villa last season, was lodged last week.

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11667/9956811/manchester-united-make-bid-for-southamptons-sadio-mane

this shouldn't hv stopped us from getting Pedro should it? absolutely not. By the way how is mane an upgrade to what we hv? We'll be better off giving the likes of lingard n pereirra first team chances.

parrotibaba:
this shouldn't hv stopped us from getting Pedro should it? absolutely not. By the way how is mane an upgrade to what we hv? We'll be better off giving the likes of lingard n pereirra first team chances.

Lingaard? Hmmm

Always shines in preseason but exposed once given an EPL game.

I will advise you let the transfer window close before you lament further.

parrotibaba:
this shouldn't hv stopped us from getting Pedro should it? absolutely not. By the way how is mane an upgrade to what we hv? We'll be better off giving the likes of lingard n pereirra first team chances.

& if that's what LvG will do, I'm fully behind it as long as they are given freedom to express themselves & whoever earns the shirt keeps it!

Pedro signs for Chelsea and i could care less! The only annoying thing is d Otamendi deal! Hope LVG knows wat he's doing(wait am i kidding, the man is as clueless as Moyes)
Hope his decisions wont come bak to hunt us by May!

Nihilist my Nigga.