Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,209,867 members, 8,007,382 topics. Date: Tuesday, 19 November 2024 at 09:18 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Islam for Muslims / Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism (13889 Views)
Islam Doesn't Teach Terrorism, Clarification Of The Quoted Qur'an Verses / Why Muslims Should Never Have To Apologize For Terrorism - By Omar Alnatour / Wahhabism/Salafism, Terrorism, Takfiri Killings,Suicide Bombing And Saudi Arabia (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by abusurv(m): 8:05pm On Oct 28, 2016 |
In Nigeria the name for the Wahhabi is jamatulizalatulbidiawaikomatisunna popular known as izala .one of the people that introduce it cheik Abubakar gumi and has it headquarters in jos and another in Kaduna. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 9:09pm On Oct 28, 2016 |
hamzeiy:So if you know this, what else you want me to prove?. Dont you think you contradict yourself? |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 9:29pm On Oct 28, 2016 |
usmanktg2:That's it. The bolded part was really my concern in the post. He condemned muslims from doing dhikr pre-fajr salat. I have this evidence in pro-ibn Wahab website. So he brought "protestant" version of Islam. However, I am not concern much about his link with terrorism. He is not alone on that. Saudi and Israel are sisters This lecture was given in late 2001 in Sidney Australia This should help brother BeansAndBread https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XcJXbaT7Cc This confirms what i said earlier. And this should help you too mr hamzeiy hamzeiy: And listen to Qaddafi. He said The Britain created Saudi Arabia. I thought you people should know this. It is in the open. Why pretending or you simply do not know? 7 Likes |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Rafidi: 11:20pm On Oct 28, 2016 |
BeansAndBread: stop lying Mr. BetaThing. a Shia will NEVER attack or fight back against ANYONE because of the person's belief. whether you call Wahhabi terrorists in Syria "civilians" or whether you call naturalized Bahraini police officers "innocent Sunnis" or whether you call resistance to israeli occupation and "martyrdom operations"-which Palestinians Sunnis are also well known for- "suicide bombing" that is your problem. the bottom-line for using force in the Holy Quran is spelled out clearly: "Permission [to fight] has been given to those who are being fought, because they were wronged. And indeed, Allah is competent to give them victory. [They are] those who have been evicted from their homes without right - only because they say, "Our Lord is Allah." And were it not that Allah checks the people, some by means of others, there would have been demolished monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques in which the name of Allah is much mentioned. And Allah will surely support those who support Him. Indeed, Allah is Powerful and Exalted in Might." (22:39-40) Allah (swt) did not give Muslims and the Prophet (s) the right to fight to convert people, or based on TAKFIRISM or because others commit "shirk" or because you do not like what they believe or how they practice. the use of force in Islam is for self defense only. the Shia are not pacifist and neither is the Holy Quran. do not mix up self-defense, or even collateral damage when innocent people perish unintentionally- as civilians from all communities are suffering in Syria- with TAKFIRI killings. and for your info, the army of Bashar al-Assad is majority Sunni soldiers. are Sunni soldiers killing Sunnis because they are Sunnis? you must be a joker! once more, stop lying. even if you worship an idol, you should feel ashamed of yourself and the belief you adhere to that makes you keep repeating the same lies over and over in every thread. any ideology or belief that makes you to intentionally and un-repentantly lie in this manner should make you reflect and reconsider even if you do not fear Allah, because there is no sign you fear Allah. you want Muslims to give cover to Wahhabi Takfiri killings. the answer, from both Shia and Sunnis, is a unanimous and unambiguous capital NO! Islam is a religion of peace and the world is getting to know as the days pass that the terrorism that so called Muslims perpetrated is WAHHABISM and NOT ISLAM! 4 Likes |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:10am On Oct 29, 2016 |
usmanktg2: Can you quote anyone who adheres to the Manhaj of the Salaf calling himself a Wahabi? So why call Muslims Wahabi? 2. For your information, there is no existing Silsila or an authentic chain from Ibn Abdulwahab to Ibn Taymiyya That doesn't change the fact that Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdulwahab followed the Manhaj of the Salafs. 3. How can we go back to the roots of islam? by reading islamic books on our own? making our own taqlid? By returning to the teachings of the Salafs and abandoning whatever the khalaf have innovated. 1. There is nothing like full blown Sufi. Islam/Sufism is not a political party. You ought to be intelligent than this, when I mentioned full blown Soofee, I meant someone who performs tawaf round the Graves of Saint, those who shout "inyass" whenever evil befalls them, etc Lol! 2. Can you point Shaykh Usman bn Fodio teachers that is 'Wahhabi'? Is Shaykh Jubril Wahhabi? I never said any of them is a Wahabi, some of his teachers benefitted from knowledge passed from Ibn Abdulwahab. Now read: One of teachers was Jibreel ibn ‘Umar of the Tuareg tribe who had made Hajj and thus lived in Makkah for a while. In Madeenah, Jibreel Ibn ‘Umar studied with Muhammad Murtada az-Zabeedee (1145-1205 AH/ 1732-1791 CE) who was originally from India but had travelled to az-Zabeed in Yemen where he lived for a while and studied before going on to teach in Madeenah himself. One of az-Zabeedee’s teachers was Shaah Waliullaah ad-Dehlawee (1702 –1762 CE) of Delhi in India. Dan Fodio’s uncle who taught him hadeeth was Muhammad bin Raaj who had studied under Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee also from India and a teacher of hadeeth in Madeenah. Abu’l-Hasan as-Sindee was a student of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee another great hadeeth scholar of India who was also teaching in Madeenah. One of Muhammad Hayaat as-Sindee’s students was Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab (raheemahumullaah). See a recent study conducted in Nigeria and written in Arabic entitled Asaaneed al-Faqeer ad-Da’eef al-Mutashaafee bi’l-Mushaffa’ Ahmad as-Shareef (Ms. University of Ibadan Library 82/137: Ibadan, Centre of Islamic Documentation (CAD)). I hope you'll open your eyes to read! 3. It is obvious you are ignorant of Shaykh Usman. Come to the north, we will teach you his teachings. When no be say I dey craze! You want to corrupt me koh? See this one o, as you can see I quoted him in my last post. Lemme give you another of his quotes: If such a person is not aware of the Sunnah it is not permissible to follow him…He is simply a lunatic lost in his special state. (ibid. p.105 (Arabic text), p. 157 (Eng. Text)) Hisn ul-Afhaam min Juyoosh ilAwhaam 4. Shaykh Usman is a Qutb, spiritual pole in Qadiriyya. As I said earlier, he wasn't a full blown Soofee. He had inclinations to salafiyyah and soofeeyyah, which is very similar to An nawawi. As for your statement that he's a "Qutb", I don't know what that means. [s]1. Quoting him saying this does in no way justifies his stand. 3. All sufis are followers of Ahl Sunna wal Jummaa and the rightly guided Salafs. Big lie, extremist Soofees like you are Semi-Shia. As popularly said by scholars; "Soofeeyyah is the gateway to Tashayyu" 4. There is hardly NO any Sufi Master that didn't wrote about the importance of Sunna and the Manhaj of Salaf. The Tijjaniyya Shaykh, Ibrahim Inyass wrote a whole book Raf'ul Malam amman rafa'a wa qabada iqtidaan bi Sayyidil Anaam, solely on following the Sunna. There's a thread on how Inyass was scrutinized, I hope you can take a look: https://www.nairaland.com/3401996/sheikh-ibrahim-niasse 1. Please give me the chain. It doesnot exist. It is even ignorant to believe that it exists. Please bring it foward. I've done that already! 2. Shaykh Usman bin Fodio wrote a whole book of his teachers, which i know you dont know about, There is NO shaykh that is not sufi. Another big lie, just because we have Soofees here doesn't mean Islam can't exist without Soofism. Islam was independent of Soofism from the beginning, so will it at the end. 3. Shaykh Usman bin fodio NEVER went to Makkah. I now confirm you dont know anything about Him. That's an honest mistake, I mistook him for Jubril Ibn Umar. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:19am On Oct 29, 2016 |
blantyre:From this post of yours, it shows you didn't even care to read the op. This is why you all will never learn, I was once like you but I was open to learn. I hated the concept of suicide bombing, I thought the Wahabists were the once that started but when I searched for scholars that condemned it, I discovered that they were Salafi Scholars. This made me to have a rethink and then I downloaded the book "Wahabi myth" which was written by Western convert. I really wish you can be sincere and just read, you'll be surprised. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 12:28am On Oct 29, 2016 |
blantyre: So returning the teachings of the Salafs is cancer, while beating yourselves, circumbulating the graves of men, etc is pure Islam? You guys never cease to amaze me! For your information an Imam of kaaba, black man confirmed that ISIS got their inspiration from the teachings of wahabism. I will provide the link Inshaallah. Don't bother, i've watched it. This Imam, Kalbani has been refuted already by salafi scholars distancing ISIS. I have loads of pdfs, books and videos which proves ISIS have nothing to salafiyyah. And lately following the gruesome murder of that Jordanian pilot by ISIS some Muslim countries started removing all nooks by ibn taimiyya from their shelves and production of new ones stopped because everyone knows the kind of violence and intolerance that those books teach. Lol, lemme clear you now. Do you know ISIS uses the word of Allaah and His apostle to justify their crimes? Are you now saying we should throw off all the Qur'an and book of hadith off the shelf just because some ignoramus misinterpret? By what you're saying, since ISIS uses the Qur'an and Hadith we should all become Toist because they're peaceful? In countries like Algeria government even gives official support to sufi zawiyas as a way of de-rsdicalising people Yet when Algeria descended into a civil war even with all the zawiyas. Rubbish!!!! I'm damn sure you didn't read the article, why can't you just take a chill pin and read! |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Rafidi: 1:06am On Oct 29, 2016 |
BeansAndBread: This is all hypocrisy. The problem isn't the means of fighting but the target that matters and the purpose. That is why JIHAD and terrorism are worlds apart. If you like jump from the sky to fight or dive into the pacific. What makes it jihad (using force for self defense only) and not terror is if it is in self defense, if it's targets are combatants who are oppressive and if the killed is a wrongdoer who killed you. Not kill based on people's beliefs. There is no takfiri killing in Islam. It makes no sense for Wahhabi clerics to condemn what you call "suicide bombings" and condone takfiri killings. It lacks essence. The difference islamically between "suicide bombing" and "martyrdom operation" based on the verdict of both Sunni and Shia scholars is the target and purpose, and not the means of fighting. I've not for once heard of Wahhabi clerics condemning suicide bombings targeting innocent Iraqi Shia civilians. I've not heard of Wahhabi clerics calling for Shia-Sunni unity, when they know well these are the two wings of Islam. Without either, the religion cannot fly! They only rush to condemn what you call "suicide bombing" in its entirety and particularly in Palestine against occupation forces because poor palestinian Sunnis use this means to resist Israeli occupation. When Israel is the target, they rush to condemn it. They have problem with Muslims defending their lives, properties and land-because of the porous and desperate means used-but have no problem with takfiri killings targeting innocent Muslims for their beliefs and religious practices. Jihad is self defense and not terrorism regardless of the means used for self defense. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by BeansAndBread(m): 10:19am On Oct 29, 2016 |
Rafidi:Everyone, here's the real terrorist. He's defending suicide bombings by calling "martyrdom operations", the worst part is all those bashing don't see this. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 10:32am On Oct 29, 2016 |
BeansAndBread: Ofcoure they won't, shi'ism and sufism are two sides of the same coin. 1 Like |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by usmanktg2(m): 11:39am On Oct 29, 2016 |
Can you quote anyone who adheres to the Manhaj of the Salaf calling himself a Wahabi? So why call Muslims Wahabi?1.You are confusing yourself here, You said Wahhabism existed thousands years back, and you are now asking me? That doesn't change the fact that Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Abdulwahab followed the Manhaj of the Salafs.1. Yes Sure, but how will i know that they follow the manhaj of the salafs? Because they made you to believe that? By returning to the teachings of the Salafs and abandoning whatever the khalaf have innovated.1. How will i return? just by reading there books? 2. Who will show me the way of the salaf? By myself? 3. You think nobody wants to follow the way of the salaf, only them? You ought to be intelligent than this, when I mentioned full blown Soofee, I meant someone who performs tawaf round the Graves of Saint, those who shout "inyass" whenever evil befalls them, etc Lol!1. You know nothing about the beliefs of DanFodio, For your information, Shaykh Usman use to perform Salatul Bagdadi before every war. Salatul Bagdadi is another chapter, why i know you will definitely call him Kafir. 2. Read Lamma Balagtu, Shaykh Usman performs many tawassul of Shaykh Abdulqadir Jilani. I know you are ignorant of all these things. And Wallahi, You have never read or seen all these his books that am quoting. I never said any of them is a Wahabi, some of his teachers benefitted from knowledge passed from Ibn Abdulwahab. Now read: 1. You clearly refuted yourself here. 2. Please show me how he benifitted from Ibn AbdulWahab here? 3. You have problem of English comprehension, Read what you just copy and pasted. When no be say I dey craze! You want to corrupt me koh? See this one o, as you can see I quoted him in my last post. Lemme give you another of his quotes: 1. Keep copying and pasting, All Sufi Shaykhs are followers of Ahl Sunna. 2. Let me quite Shaykh Ibrahim Niass also: Wal qasdu Ahya Sunnatul Amin, wa tariqil qauma lil qurun As I said earlier, he wasn't a full blown Soofee. He had inclinations to salafiyyah and soofeeyyah, which is very similar to An nawawi. As for your statement that he's a "Qutb", I don't know what that means. 1. You still cannot link him to Wahhabism. 2. You still cannot unlink him from Qadiriyya. Big lie, extremist Soofees like you are Semi-Shia. As popularly said by scholars; "Soofeeyyah is the gateway to Tashayyu" 1. Empty and hollow thread devoid of intellectual discussions. 2. I have read almost all of Shaykh Niass's books. 3. You can quote him here anywhere from his 75 and above books. I've done that already! Read your books, dont copy and paste. That's an honest mistake, I mistook him for Jubril Ibn Umar. 1. It is not a mistake, You are ignorant of that, that is why. You dont know before i told you, you google searched and found what i told you is true. 2. Please, How many of Shaykh Usman books have you read cover to cover, Please be sincere. 1 Like |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:14pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
Demmzy15:Thank God u said misconception! The reality is there for all to see that Wahabbism is the root cause of terrorism among muslims. Their fanatical form of sunna is alien to other sunnis prior to Abdulwahabb's limelight and even after his demise. Saudi has been the major financier of ISIS. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:18pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
usmanktg2:Thank u my brother! The paid writer has done his work and I believe already paid by the OIL SHEIKH for burnishing their tattered image |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:20pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
HAH:Wahabbism is the great threat muslims r facing today! |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:28pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
Ahmadabd:Like seriously! So u expect us to follow a complete aberration called Wahabbism? I thought u could do better than this, but I now know better. The fact remains every wahabbist has a terroristical tendency! This group has tattrerd muslims image world wide |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:30pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
HAH:Dont mind them, they think they r smarter thab others. Who is financing ISIS? |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:35pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
HAH:Yes ooo. These r people that claim to be holier than thou! yet utterly corrupt likw others but profess to be onlly true muslim group. Killing a fellow muslim by wahabbist is the easier than anything else. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:40pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:Forget about the name! by their fruit u shall know. Doea bearing Muhammad makes one a true muslim? Likewise connically coining names that literally look virtuous to deceive unsuspecting muslims won't save u. Almighty Allah is after the content of ur work with genuine intention 1 Like |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:40pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
HAH:Yes ooo. These r people that claim to be holier than thou! yet utterly corrupt likw others but profess to be onlly true muslim group. Killing a fellow muslim by wahabbist is the easier than anything else. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:42pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:the killings of thousands of muslins in taif,Madina and others was the way of who? |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 3:56pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:Hmm bravo! So calling to Tawheed started with Abdulwahab? Ain't we had great scholars who preached tawheed b4 him? why were they not abhored by other muslims like every one does when Abdulwahabb name is mention? Whether u believe it or not British created Saudi and its sister country called Israel This British r ready to use what ever means to get what they want. Tha aim of creating the Wahabbiyah govt was to decimate the might id Othoman empire, knowing fully well that whoever control the The sacred towns of Mecca and Madina has influence over other muslims; if not for Mecca and Madina who gonna mention saudi ma self? 7 Likes 2 Shares |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 4:25pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
President99: if you don't understand my post, don't quote me. 1 Like |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Empiree: 5:59pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
The thing is this, I am not the type that go around screaming "Wahabi/salafi" and i hate to contribute in this type of thread bcus of non-muslims especially. However, what i noticed about this bashing of wahabi/salafi in this thread is that, pro wahabi brothers here brought this bashing upon themselves. I dont think any of you should take it personal at all. I have no schism against the man named Ibn Abdual Wahab (may Allah forgive his shortcomings). I believe he was muslim but he did not understand some stuff in islam that he condemned. Also, claim that he revived or emphasized "tawheed" is baseless. They want to use this to castigate other Muslims. Weren't Muslims before him?. He condemned whatever he did not understand as shirk or bid'a which we see today. As for brothers who vehemently defend him, you brought this bashing on yourselves for the fact that you portrayed pro-wahabi scholars as "only" authentic Muslims as if there are no Muslims outside of Arabia. This is very wrong. If other Muslims outside of Arabia were mushrik, how come you people are Muslims today in Nigeria?. Were your forefathers mushrikun for bringing you up as Muslims?. You had no idea who Ibn Abdual wahab was when you were young. You only got to know him recently. The same thing Jabata did when he called his father mushrik. Yet, he benefited from his Sufi father. Anyways, problems that I have with these brothers is they do not blink twice before bashing non wahabi scholars and call them all sort of names "Alhu bida and mushrikun". Example is a thread opened recently about Sheikh Ibrahim Niyas(ra). Approach of cons are not sunnatic at all. They judged the man base on picture. They talked nonsense and attributed it to him without evidence other than to say "go and read xyz book. And you are the same people who campaigned against insulting past Ulama. Bottomline is, you brought this bashing on yourselves and on Ibn AbdualWahab. And my understanding is, he retracted somef his misunderstanding before he died. For instance, he retracted his belief on Tazkiyah. This is something attributed to Sufis. Why would he condemn what Allah enjoined?. Tazkiyah has to do with Dhikr but this man called Ibn AbduWahab go against it. I cant consider someone like that a mujadid. His wrong concept is what is affecting his pros today. They condemn dhikr as well, at least in congregation. I see that online and offline. But when Eld comes or Juma'h, all of a sudden they start talking about doing dhikr which means they are "part time" or "protestant" muslims. And yes, he and his successors have ties with the British like Ibn Saud who took bribe from the British but he called it "jizya". Even his people back then questioned him about this. The 5k pounds he took monthly from White man was for him to disobeyed a specific order of Allah in the Qur'an. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Demmzy15(m): 8:45pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
President99:Why is that you guys are like this? You didn't even care to read the article which is very dishonest of you. 1. You say saudi funds ISIS, but ISIS has suicide bombed suicide mosques filled with military men. 2. According to ISIS, Saudi rulers and scholars are apostates. 3. Saudi Arabia has missionaries in Indian for more than 40years and today, we have almost none of Indian Muslims in ISIS or any extremist groups. Why can't you all think? 1 Like |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Demmzy15(m): 8:47pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
President99:Assad and those who patronize their stolen oil. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:09pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:Brother, ur post was attempt to dignify Wahhabbism , which is an aberration to the whole sunna practice! U said "Whoever calls to tawheed is tagged a wahhabist! Smh" this is a veiled statement brother and is an insult to the sensibility of other muslims scholars. What u insinuate here is that is only Abdulwahabb that practices true Tawheed or what? Greater preachers had existed before him and were not detested by other muslims, they never issued fatwa justifying killing of muslims who had different takes from theirs. Young man what were the reasons for killings of muslims in Hijaz, Mecca, Madina and taif during the formative years of Wahabbist govt? 5 Likes |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 9:13pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
President99: you don't understand my post, again don't quote me if you don't! i dont have time for all these now, i have more pressing issues at hand!! |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:26pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
Demmzy15:U can likewise deny the role of British in the creation of Saudi and Israel but one thing is certain, U can fool all, all the time brother. So u r not aware of international conspiracy and u want discuss the most ruthless terrorism group issue on earth? So even the leaked USA's classified documents by julian assange has not cleated ur doubt?? Saudi n Qatar r d financiers according to hilary clinton leaked emails 4 Likes |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:32pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
Demmzy15:their stolen oil got me lol |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 9:35pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:U v got nothing to send to defend this munderous group called Wahabbism, so u resorted to the above mantra!. Wahabbism is synonym with terrorism!!! |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by Nobody: 10:00pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
President99: see, whatever i don't have time for this. |
Re: Don’t Blame ‘wahhabism’ For Terrorism by President99: 10:46pm On Oct 29, 2016 |
lexiconkabir:Jst for one-paid writer to come up with a statement that indians ain't terrorists despite Sauduli financial help for them and that became ur reference point. Who has independently verified this? Okay here r them, though ISIS is opinion they r not fighters, some of indian recruits got beheaded for reasons best known to their Sheikhs! 7 Indian firms among those in Islamic State supply chain: EU ... indianexpress.com/.../7- indian-firms... 15 missing Indian Muslims feared to have joined ISIS - ARA News aranews.net/.../15-missing- indian-muslim... ISIS does not consider Indians good fighter - Times of India m.timesofindia.com/.../ ISIS ... Indian... How many Indian youths have joined ISIS? - Quora https://www.quora.com/How-many- India ... Hpoe this clear ur doubt that writer was just hallucinating that Indians r not terrorists even Wahabbist influence on them. |
Family Planning/Population Control: An Islamic Perspective (For/Against?) / Is The One Who Dies Of The Coronavirus Disease A Martyr? / What Is The Difference?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 122 |