sinizia:


No offence intended, but the emboldened is an avalanche of bullshît. Better still, it's aptly described as apples and oranges. Makes no goddamn sense.

1. Watford have never spent the kind of huge money the likes of Shitty, United, Chelshit, Barcelona and other top clubs have spent in this modern transfer window in their entire history. Apples and oranges.

2. Watford are ambitious, but there own ambitions is survival in the EPL and having a good run generally in cup competitions or league. Any other achievements like winning the FA Cup, Caraboa Cup or qualifying for European competition is a bonus and a lucky achievement for them, so sacking managers is means of survival not to win major trophies. But when top clubs sack mangers, it's usually for them not making the UCL or winning trophies. Apples and oranges.

3. When Man Shitty sacked Pellegrini, they got Pep. Who did Watford get? When Man Shitty hired Pep, they did with the future dream of winning UCL, league titles and having the success Pep brought to Bayern, Barca. Which success or targets will Watford demand from the average coach that replaced Silva? Apples and oranges.

4. Watford after sacking the coach before Silva was appointed, how much did they spend, and what are the quality of players they bought? When Man City appointed Mancini, below is what a website had to write about their ambitions, and onslaught in the transfer window. Check out the players they got and how much they spent.



Man City's spending and the players they bought showed the higher ambitions of that club; Man City sack managers to aim higher, Watford sack theirs to escape relegation. Once again, apples and oranges.

5. Finally, the most funny one - You've the chutzpah to list Tevez, Mascherano and Lavezzi in your argument. First of all, the Chinese league just like the American league snap up mostly expired or waning TOP players who's past their prime (the young ones are usually average players or poor low tier ones) because theirs are still a growing league and need the influx of popular players to put their league on the map. They're not yet established. When LA Galaxy signed Beckham, they knew he's finished, or at least they signed him coz of his A-list status. He was signed to bring American league to the limelight. Beckham spent his prime at United and Madrid. It's same for Xavi and his Qatar quest. So if I find it funny that you're mentioning mercenaries and expired products like Mascherano, Lavezzi and Tevez who have their best years behind them. Who next will you mention? The Oscars, Anichebes and Ighalos of this world?

Chinese clubs owners are showing ambition like their American counterparts by bringing in this popular stars to help grow their league, while these expired stars are going their for the money. So yes, The Chinese club owners are showing ambitions, that's why they criticised Tevez for scamming them when they were dreaming of having a determined Tevez of yesteryears. Neymar moved from Barca to PSG but his dream of competing at the highest stage, playing in Europe's top competition and at the highest level were never in doubt. If he'd done the same with the Chinese league, everybody would've concluded it is for the money because Chinese league is a lowly rated league which top players in demand doesn't give a fùck about. If Lavezzi, Tevez and co moves to City, their ambitions are not questioned coz City is a top club in England and Europe top 5 league, but when they move to China, everybody knows the truth that's its about the money. The difference is clear.

sinizia:


80 Whaaaaaaaat?!!


80m on top the 500k+ contract and other juicy bonus? Are you serious?

And these people are hyperventilating over 10m signing-on bonus of Sanchez?

joeace2020:


I was already thinking how do i reply an illiterate who would say the most mudane thing just to sound intelligent. You've said it just as i would love. The likes of Raumdeuter can be tolerated because they make sensible arrguments some times regardless of the amala turning proficiency but to come to a public forum and declare that Man City was paying record sums on players and changing coaches because it was all fun bothers on lunacy.

eph12:

Have you compared his numbers with other midfielders? How is he faring in terms of contribution to goals even across Europe?

sinizia:


No offence intended, but the emboldened is an avalanche of bullshît. Better still, it's aptly described as apples and oranges. Makes no goddamn sense.

1. Watford have never spent the kind of huge money the likes of Shitty, United, Chelshit, Barcelona and other top clubs have spent in this modern transfer window in their entire history. Apples and oranges.

2. Watford are ambitious, but there own ambitions is survival in the EPL and having a good run generally in cup competitions or league. Any other achievements like winning the FA Cup, Caraboa Cup or qualifying for European competition is a bonus and a lucky achievement for them, so sacking managers is means of survival not to win major trophies. But when top clubs sack mangers, it's usually for them not making the UCL or winning trophies. Apples and oranges.

3. When Man Shitty sacked Pellegrini, they got Pep. Who did Watford get? When Man Shitty hired Pep, they did with the future dream of winning UCL, league titles and having the success Pep brought to Bayern, Barca. Which success or targets will Watford demand from the average coach that replaced Silva? Apples and oranges.

4. Watford after sacking the coach before Silva was appointed, how much did they spend, and what are the quality of players they bought? When Man City appointed Mancini, below is what a website had to write about their ambitions, and onslaught in the transfer window. Check out the players they got and how much they spent.



Man City's spending and the players they bought showed the higher ambitions of that club; Man City sack managers to aim higher, Watford sack theirs to escape relegation. Once again, apples and oranges.

5. Finally, the most funny one - You've the chutzpah to list Tevez, Mascherano and Lavezzi in your argument. First of all, the Chinese league just like the American league snap up mostly expired or waning TOP players who's past their prime (the young ones are usually average players or poor low tier ones) because theirs are still a growing league and need the influx of popular players to put their league on the map. They're not yet established. When LA Galaxy signed Beckham, they knew he's finished, or at least they signed him coz of his A-list status. He was signed to bring American league to the limelight. Beckham spent his prime at United and Madrid. It's same for Xavi and his Qatar quest. So if I find it funny that you're mentioning mercenaries and expired products like Mascherano, Lavezzi and Tevez who have their best years behind them. Who next will you mention? The Oscars, Anichebes and Ighalos of this world?

Chinese clubs owners are showing ambition like their American counterparts by bringing in this popular stars to help grow their league, while these expired stars are going their for the money. So yes, The Chinese club owners are showing ambitions, that's why they criticised Tevez for scamming them when they were dreaming of having a determined Tevez of yesteryears. Neymar moved from Barca to PSG but his dream of competing at the highest stage, playing in Europe's top competition and at the highest level were never in doubt. If he'd done the same with the Chinese league, everybody would've concluded it is for the money because Chinese league is a lowly rated league which top players in demand doesn't give a fùck about. If Lavezzi, Tevez and co moves to City, their ambitions are not questioned coz City is a top club in England and Europe top 5 league, but when they move to China, everybody knows the truth that's its about the money. The difference is clear.

Lana1:
The fact he even brought up the Chinese league and Watford puts to rest any doubt i had about his intelligence. Dude is straight up dumb!!
Just like a bungalow he has nothing upstairs.

patrickmuf:
I am only happy that Dayo and his folks where taken to the cleaners here.

How can someone claim Sanchez's reported fee is after tax and when quizzed on KDB he begins to backtrack? It's funny people just say things some many times hoping to becomes a pillar to which they stand.

See Dayo acknowledging that Zlatan took a pay cut yet he posted a table that had Zlatan earning so much, a table that didn't have KDB whose new deal was announced same time with Sanchez arrival here.

Una go tire last last when he starts banging in goals.

Skimpledawg:

Brother, let it go. Some peeps here are not civilized.

Bibidear:
oga,i like u already.......brilliant write up......dont mind d hater

sinizia:


80 Whaaaaaaaat?!!


80m on top the 500k+ contract and other juicy bonus? Are you serious?

And these people are hyperventilating over 10m signing-on bonus of Sanchez?

PietroRico:
After all is said and done, Una go realize say last last the swap deal with mkhi means the actual cost of Sanchez's deal in wages is really the small amount we added to Mkhitaryan's own.

One 29 year old swapped for a much better age mate, no transfer fee with only about 150k or thereabout a week extra.
Make of it what you will but this is a major coup.
We for sign moura for around 25m and pay am 150k wages on top and nobody for bat eyelid

Idiots

Ibime:


Messi learned from how Neymar took money as signing on fee, leaving Santos with virtually nothing.

He ran his contract down till it was 7 months left.

He figured Barca would pay £200m if they had to buy him normally so why not take £80m for himself. As far as Barca are concerned, they've saved £120m.

This is the new reality now. Players are now trading on the opportunity cost of signing a replacement by letting their contracts run down and getting paid off signing bonus.

dopeJemi:

You like him already?

CapitalCee:


So when it's man u players we links. but for other teams player verify with deductive reasoning. I have learnt one

MoR2:
NO

ok may we agree first, you no say pogba no be attacker so forget the counting of goals. his stats and assists are ok.

pogba is contributing to his team no doubt, but it would be silly to start comparing him to coutinho or kdb when they clearly have different styles and different roles. the most important thing is how well does pogba interpret his role in that team that makes him so valueable as to earn 290k per week and is his performance consistent. e.g kante.

i've gotten used to the new pogba, but am not sure what the new pogba is and what he stands for. to me he was a regular boss in midfield, a beauty to watch. people want to see the passion that goes with the paycheck.

odizeey:
civilized people call their fellow humans fools. Weh done sir.

Skimpledawg:

Don't we call each other here fools? Don't we throw snide remarks and puerile banters here at each other?

We see it as fun. No matter how provoked Dayo, Airmark, sinizia and other posters here argue, no parent cussing.

What Eruditor(our resident Prof) did is uncalled for and very childish. I dont expect you to see it that way though.

Bibidear:
yes oooo,is it bad

odizeey:
civilized people call their fellow humans fools. Weh done sir.

dopeJemi:


No oh

Skimpledawg:

Don't we call each other here fools? Don't we throw snide remarks and puerile banters here at each other?

We see it as fun. No matter how provoked Dayo, Airmark, sinizia and other posters here argue, no parent cussing.

What Eruditor(our resident Prof) did is uncalled for and very childish. I dont expect you to see it that way though.

MoR2:
NO

ok may we agree first, you no say pogba no be attacker so forget the counting of goals. his stats and assists are ok.

pogba is contributing to his team no doubt, but it would be silly to start comparing him to coutinho or kdb when they clearly have different styles and different roles. the most important thing is how well does pogba interpret his role in that team that makes him so valueable as to earn 290k per week and is his performance consistent. e.g kante.

i've gotten used to the new pogba, but am not sure what the new pogba is and what he stands for. to me he was a regular boss in midfield, a beauty to watch. people want to see the passion that goes with the paycheck.

elrony:


Ogbeni keep kwayet there!!!...are you new to banter on this forum.

Swear on your life that you've not called a player on TV a fool. Let's start from there!

odizeey:

I'm not taking sides o.
But if you wanna throw insults on an online platform, where you know little about everyone, expect anything in return. Especially from an opposing supporter.
I don't like what he did, but let's try and reduce the name calling, cos this kind of thing is going to happen again.

elrony:


To give odizeey Holy slap dey hungry me!!!

Buh I don't want to provoke the Most High this morning.

dopeJemi:
Oasis, how far.. no pictures of the team training? heard they trained yesterday, look for the ones wey Sanchez dey

odizeey:
as you sabi cal person fool. If them call your papa fool no vex, cos you might just be insulting someone's pops.

Skimpledawg:


Plz don't. We want to avoid what happened in Sodom and Gomorrah Biko

joeace2020:
Further proof of press feeding the anti-united fan club. Visit the comment section of this and you will see raw hate. How can City qualify for a cup final and a newspapers top news is Sanchez's Dogs? Sanchez's Dog for heaven sake. The same people who will complain about this will still abandon anything about their clubs and litter the united articles with comments and generate more money for the dailyfail