Like play, Pogba is staying

Harry Kane might join.....200m

Expert17:
Harry Kane might join.....200m

Not happening.

Expert17:
Harry Kane might join.....200m

It would be madness if the highest order. 200m? Not happening.

afrodoc2:


It would be madness if the highest order. 200m? Not happening.

200m is too much............Daniel Levy wan cash out

Nobody will ever agree to this deal. 200 what?

Expert17:
Harry Kane might join.....200m

Not happening. With all these loss on profit as a result of Covid-19, where will the funds come from?

This pandemic might just be what the transfer window needs to force player valuation back to normal. The bubble is about to burst.

Expert17:
Harry Kane might join.....200m

I don't think he's needed, and certainly not for that price.

Tundexi:
Like play, Pogba is staying

Tbh, it will be in our best interest if he stays and plays like the world class midfielder we know he is.
Fred is the one who'll probably get bounced for him.

Pogba, Bruno, Fred, McTom, Matic, Garner and maybe a new midfielder. That's a lot of good options to have in midfield.

ChristineC:
I don't think he's needed, and certainly not for that price.

LMFAO.....I am really curious to know why you think Harry Kane is not needed? Will you reject lewandoski as well.

I think we need Harry Kane, his goal/game ratio is stunning...........if spurs will take 80m + Perreira.

Then Ighalo will go bck to China, and Martial will shift to the wing.

Pogba and Fernandes behind Kane is something else.

Expert17:
I think we need Harry Kane, his goal/game ratio is stunning...........if spurs will take 80m + Perreira.

Then Ighalo will go bck to China, and Martial will shift to the wing.

Pogba and Fernandes behind Kane is something else.

Martial? Wings? How?

He obviously cannot bench Rashford on the left. And anytime he has played on the right, he has been outright useless.

Would be for the best if he continued playing from the centre. Either that or they sell him.

Y’all back with this marquee signing syndrome.. last time the club embarked heavily on that, where did it lead us?

If Kane doesn’t suit what OGS wants, then we don’t need him, especially at the crazy price Levy loves slamming on his players once United is involved...

Expert17:
I think we need Harry Kane, his goal/game ratio is stunning...........if spurs will take 80m + Perreira.

Then Ighalo will go bck to China, and Martial will shift to the wing.

Pogba and Fernandes behind Kane is something else.

This is literally the worse proposition I've heard since the lockdown began.

Martial finally starting to understand the position and gets shunted to the left wing as a reward (let's not even talk about how he will tackle the incumbent there who's currently the superior winger)

Ighalo gone means no backup striker available for rotation/resting.

Mason Greenwood can also kiss his hopes of emergence as the first choice goodbye.

We're not even talking about how an expenditure of this magnitude will affect our chance of actually fixing the right wing position once and for all.

Let's get a fookin' right winger before we blow our wad on a striker Tottenham have extracted every bit of life force from through overexertion and almost no rotation for the better part of 4 years now

DeadPresidents:


This is literally the worse proposition I've heard since the lockdown began.

Martial finally starting to understand the position and gets shunted to the left wing as a reward (let's not even talk about how he will tackle the incumbent there who's currently the superior winger)

Ighalo gone means no backup striker available for rotation/resting.

Mason Greenwood can also kiss his hopes of emergence as the choice goodbye.

We're not even talking about how an expenditure of this magnitude will affect our chance of actually fixing the right wing position once and for all.

Martial starting to understand after how many seasons at United.... Rooney was enjoying the forward role 2011/2012 scoring 27 EPL goals(his best tally in a season)......Ferguson still bought Robin- Van persie.

The reason we are having this discussion is because OGS coudnt get Haaland in the January transfer window.

We should be thinking of how to play them together,

Like it or not, Kane is an upgrade to what we have now

United do not need Kane. The Board should never spend a Dime on him, rather spend wisely to get a RW.

I am more convinced United will get Sancho, but I wouldn't mind Traore as well, perhaps in a direct swap deal - Lingard. Perreira+ €50m should be enough to get Sancho from Dortmund.

Expert17:


Martial starting to understand after how many seasons at United.... Rooney was enjoying the forward role 2011/2012 scoring 27 EPL goals(his best tally in a season)......Ferguson still bought Robin- Van persie.

The reason we are having this discussion is because OGS coudnt get Haaland in the January transfer window.

We should be thinking of how to play them together,

Like it or not, Kane is an upgrade to what we have now

Kane currently being an upgrade is not the concern for me. On paper, Sanchez was an upgrade on Rashford + Martial. That turned out beautifully I guess.

My current concern is what Tottenham has done to him. Kane was always playing and never resting. Sanchez experienced the same treatment and his legs gave in time.

How do we know the same thing is not happening to Kane?

Bruno should be part of the 3 attackers behind the striker. I don’t want to see him in a double pivot in midfield. It’s a waste of his talents.

spillo1:

LMFAO.....I am really curious to know why you think Harry Kane is not needed? Will you reject lewandoski as well.

the topic isn't about Lewandowski. United don't need Kane.
he's going to score, of course, yet I don't think he's an essential. it's a commodity United can afford to overlook and still be on track.
In case you didn't notice, there are goals in the team and the missing component has been creativity. we have it on the left, we have it through the middle, we have it from deep if Pogba stays. we just need to find it on the right as well and we wouldn't require a 25-goal CF to have success.

DeadPresidents:


Kane currently being an upgrade is not the concern for me. On paper, Sanchez was an upgrade on Rashford + Martial. That turned out beautifully I guess.

My current concern is what Tottenham has done to him. Kane was always playing and never resting. Sanchez experienced the same treatment and his legs gave in time.

How do we know the same thing is not happening to Kane?

You got a valid point.

I dnt see us winning the league with Martial as our 9..

We need RW & CF

Leyqute:
Bruno should be part of the 3 attackers behind the striker. I don’t want to see him in a double pivot in midfield. It’s a waste of his talents.

I highly doubt OGS will ever leave Bruno in a double pivot.. especially when OGS favorite formation has always been 4-2-3-1.. or the secondary one which is 3-5-2...

ChristineC:
the topic isn't about Lewandowski. United don't need Kane.
he's going to score, of course, yet I don't think he's an essential. it's a commodity United can afford to overlook and still be on track.
In case you didn't notice, there are goals in the team and the missing component has been creativity. we have it on the left, we have it through the middle, we have it from deep if Pogba stays. we just need to find it on the right as well and we wouldn't require a 25-goal CF to have success.

The topic is about United going for a top striker and you saying you don't think United need a top striker which is why I am asking if it was to be Lewandoski United was going for will you say he is not needed as well and Who are those in our current team that are guaranteed goal scorers?

Expert17:


You got a valid point.

I dnt see us winning the league with Martial as our 9..

We need RW & CF

Start seeing it.. he wasn’t given the No9 Jersey for club sales lol

You’ll be amazed how things can change with a simple upgrade on a particular position. In this case, the Right-Wing.

Everyone has seen how Bruno’s inclusion has switched things up..

GloryIsaac:


I highly doubt OGS will ever leave Bruno in a double pivot.. especially when OGS favorite formation has always been 4-2-3-1.. or the secondary one which is 3-5-2...

He’s played in a double midfield pivot once. Then OGS grew some sense and started playing him higher up the pitch.

Lingard salary should be above Dortmund structure.

If Sancho, Bruno and pogba create the chances we need,...you are expecting Martial to score them??

Martial that plays better while running with the ball........

How many defenders will Martial beat on air?? how many defenders can he out-muscle on the ball??

We need physical presence in the opposition box, that will give opponent defenders something to dream about, a night before matchday.

spillo1:

The topic is about United going for a top striker and you saying you don't think United need a top striker which is why I am asking if it was to be Lewandoski United was going for will you say he is not needed as well and Who are those in our current team that are guaranteed goal scorers?

That amount they are quoting is too much. If Kane is going for a bit half of that, we won't be having this discussion. Sanchez is still on 350k+ weekly

spillo1:

The topic is about United going for a top striker and you saying you don't think United need a top striker which is why I am asking if it was to be Lewandoski United was going for will you say he is not needed as well and Who are those in our current team that are guaranteed goal scorers?

Rashford, Bruno and Martial are our goal scorers. If the RWinger contributes lots of goals too we won’t need a traditional 9.

But is Kane a fluid front-man? Can he play across the front 3 like OGS wants?

GloryIsaac:


Start seeing it.. he wasn’t given the No9 Jersey for club sales lol

You’ll be amazed how things can change with a simple upgrade on a particular position. In this case, the Right-Wing.

Everyone has seen how Bruno’s inclusion has switched things up..

I hope so....

But i dnt rate him, as a CF

eph12:

That amount they are quoting is too much. If Kane is going for a bit half of that, we won't be having this discussion. Sanchez is still on 350k+ weekly

If his argument was the price being quoted then I have no disagreement about it. It's the part of United does not need Kane that I am trying to figure out. That's why I am asking him if the striker was lewandoski will he say we don't need him and should stick with Martial.

spillo1:

If his argument was the price being quoted then I have no disagreement about it. It's the part of United does not need Kane that I am trying to figure out. That's why I am asking him if the striker was lewandoski will he say we don't need him and should stick with Martial.

We need to stop buying players because they are available. Sanchez’s purchase should have taught us enough lessons.