We are very significant. And what we say is significant as well. Otherwise it wouldnt have hurt God when you say He doesn't exist.
He made us in his image and likeness. He knows every detail about me,down to the proteins and sugars that make up my DNA.
I am significant what i say matters alot to him. That's one of the reasons He made me to speak!

Pls, any real evolutionist out there? Please answer this:

what da hell happened to the missing link between man and ape?

centje: We are very significant. And what we say is significant as well. Otherwise it wouldnt have hurt God when you say He doesn't exist.
He made us in his image and likeness. He knows every detail about me,down to the proteins and sugars that make up my DNA.
I am significant what i say matters alot to him.

Baba were. Do i hurt God? what about this

Oahray: Pls, any real evolutionist out there? Please answer this:

what da hell happened to the missing link between man and ape?

Look in the mirror.


Jk. but I just couldnt pass on that opportunity

Ileke-IdI:


Look in the mirror.


Jk. but I just couldnt pass on that opportunity

hahahaha... Nah... ooman says I am the missing link between cockroach and nothing

ooman:

Baba were. Do i hurt God? what about this

and because of that there's no God?

centje: and because of that there's no God?

What is darkness except lack of light. What is evil except lack of God, or at least lack of a good God

While we wait for an atheist/evolutionist to tell us what happened to the missing link, here is an example of how unreliable human knowledge can be:

Spontaneous Generation
For thousands of years it was believed that life regularly arose from the elements without first being formed through a seed, egg, or other traditional means of reproduction. The main purveyor of the theory was Aristotle, who based his studies on the ideas of thinkers like Anaximander, Hippolytus, and Anaxagoras, all of whom stressed the ways in which life could spontaneously come into being from inanimate matter like slime, mud, and earth when exposed to sunlight. Aristotle based his own ideas on the observation of the ways maggots would seemingly generate out of dead animal carcass, or barnacles would form on the hull of a boat. This theory that life could literally spring from nothing managed to persist for hundreds of years after Aristotle, and was even being proposed by some scientists as recently as the 1700s.

How it was Proven Wrong:
It was only with the adoption of the scientific method that many of the classical theories like spontaneous generation began to be tested. Once they were, they quickly crumbled. For example, famed scientist Louis Pasteur showed that maggots would not appear on meat kept in a sealed container, and the invention of the microscope helped to show that these same insects were formed not by spontaneous generation but by airborne microorganisms.

Does spontaneous generation sound alot like evolution or is it just me?
Both hold that something springs out of nothing. That says alot.

Anyone found out what happened to the missing link yet?

ooman:

What is darkness except lack of light. What is evil except lack of God, or at least lack of a good God

Make up your mind man. Are you atheist or agnostic? You seem confused.

Oahray: Make up your mind man. Are you atheist or agnostic? You seem confused.

Get thee away from me, Satan. I was only trying to keep an open mind to a wise gentle soul.

ooman:

Get thee away from me, Satan. I was only trying to keep an open mind to a wise gentle soul.

Lol. I just made an atheist believe in Satan. Do you know he is spirit too?

ooman:

What is darkness except lack of light. What is evil except lack of God, or at least lack of a good God

a simple observation of nature will reveal to you that there are opposites of almost everything. If you believe in darkness and evil,what's blinding you from accepting the existence light and good(God).

centje: a simple observation of nature will reveal to you that there are opposites of almost everything. If you believe in darkness and evil,what's blinding you from accepting the existence light and good(God).

You dont understand. Naturally there is nothing like darkness except the lack of light. So normally, there is nothing like evil except the lack of God.

Oahray: Lol. I just made an atheist believe in Satan. Do you know he is spirit too?

I'd rather believe in the devil than in your God.

ooman:

I'd rather believe in the devil than in your God.

you obviously do... Deep down. You just do not want to admit it. At least its more reasonable than the evolution crap. I have seen people do magic... Things science cannot explain.
Spirits exist man. Either you believe it or tell me why the missing link went missing.

Oahray: you obviously do... Deep down. You just do not want to admit it. At least its more reasonable than the evolution crap. I have seen people do magic... Things science cannot explain.
Spirits exist man. Either you believe it or tell me why the missing link went missing.

You know i said i would avoid you but you kept on saying missing link like you know what you are talking about.

I will only ask you a question.

Where are the fossils of the whole world God killed in Noah's flood?

Now that is God's missing link

ooman:

You dont understand. Naturally there is nothing like darkness except the lack of light. So normally, there is nothing like evil except the lack of God.

so ooman how did the universe and life start?

Oahray:
Atheists assert there is no God. Have you guys been able to prove it yet?

Why is it you believe evolution? Because many scientists believe it? No?

Have you witnessed any creature evolve before?
Is it not hearsay?
Why is it you believe scientists who tell you they know the origin of life some billions of years ago just with little pieces of bones and other fossil?
Why is it you guys think nothing of the Piltdown man scam by evolutionists in an attempt to cement their baseless theory?

If a person comes out today to say rats are generated spontaneously from garbage, wouldnt you guys call him a f.o.o.l? Yet many years ago, it was held as scientific truth.

Just like the Theory of Spontaneous Generation and other thrash once held as truth by scientists, the theory of Evolution is baseless and requires alot of gullibility and blind faith in fallible science.

It is foolish to believe that from nothing, the right electronic components can somehow be assembled together under the right conditions by chance, and a blackberry phone would be produced.

So yes, atheists are fools!

Erm, bros, all this long story just to show you don't know what evolution is? You're clearly ignorant. It's very common in these parts though, people proud of their ignorance ie. Usually you display the kind of knowledge about these things I would expect a person born blind would display while discussing the mona lisa.

But that's not the issue here for now, and I don't feel the need to school you for free. So, back to my initial question. I should just accept your claims because you say so? If the best you can come up with translates to 'yes', may I just tell you "4k you, you moro.nic and deluded ignoramus" ahead of time? Before you ask me to accept your god, prove it to me. It's the same I would ask of you.

And guess what your ignorance, in this universe something can come from nothing, if indeed you can call it nothing. That's another story though.

Gullibility... Heh heh heh

ooman:

You know i said i would avoid you but you kept on saying missing link like you know what you are talking about.

I will only ask you a question.

Where are the fossils of the whole world God killed in Noah's flood?

Now that is God's missing link

lol... I like how you try to baffle me with bullshit. Dazzle me with some brilliance man.
Those animals are part the very bones and fossils archaelogists keep discovering.

Isnt it funny that the fossil record shows not gradual evolution but species jumping directly into the fossil records? No evidence of the missing link either, so they had to fake one.

You still have not answered my question. Evolution holds that an evolved organism is better equipped to survive than the parent organism.
So why is it the apes (parent) and humans survived but the ape men didnt?
Why did the link go missing?

Oahray: you obviously do... Deep down. You just do not want to admit it. At least its more reasonable than the evolution crap. I have seen people do magic... Things science cannot explain.
Spirits exist man. Either you believe it or tell me why the missing link went missing.

Just to clarify

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

This should clear things up for you.

wiegraf:

Erm, bros, all this long story just to show you don't know what evolution is? You're clearly ignorant. It's very common in these parts though, people proud of their ignorance ie. Usually you display the kind of knowledge about these things I would expect a person born blind would display while discussing the mona lisa.

But that's not the issue here for now, and I don't feel the need to school you for free. So, back to my initial question. I should just accept your claims because you say so? If the best you can come up with translates to 'yes', may I just tell you "4k you, you moro.nic and deluded ignoramus" ahead of time? Before you ask me to accept your god, prove it to me. It's the same I would ask of you.

And guess what your ignorance, in this universe something can come from nothing , if indeed you can call it nothing. That's another story though.

Gullibility... Heh heh heh

lol. This long post with little meaningful info. You believe everything science tells you, ryt? See who isnt gullible.

Its either you do not understand evolution yourself and are just blindly believing it, or you are just acting d.umb. The former looks to be the the case tho.

As regards the bolded, please give me an example of one thing that comes from nothing. Then tell me how in your example energy is neither created nor destroyed.

Oahray: lol. This long post with little meaningful info. You believe everything science tells you, ryt? See who isnt gullible.

Its either you do not understand evolution yourself and are just blindly believing it, or you are just acting d.umb. The former looks to be the the case tho.

As regards the bolded, please give me an example of one thing that comes from nothing. Then tell me how in your example energy is neither created nor destroyed.

If nothing comes from nothing, where does God come from?

Oahray: lol. This long post with little meaningful info. You believe everything science tells you, ryt? See who isnt gullible.

Its either you do not understand evolution yourself and are just blindly believing it, or you are just acting d.umb. The former looks to be the the case tho.

As regards the bolded, please give me an example of one thing that comes from nothing. Then tell me how in your example energy is neither created nor destroyed.

Can you not read you c.lout? I said I don't feel the need to teach you. If you paying I may reconsider though.

Anyhow, you now want me to clarify, yes? You won't accept my claims without any evidence, yes? You now miraculously understand the situation when it's you who is being asked to believe something just because?

So, prove to me that something cannot come nothing.

wiegraf:

Can you not read you c.lout? I said I don't feel the need to teach you. If you paying I may reconsider though.

Anyhow, you now want me to clarify now yes? You won't accept my claims without any evidence yes? You now miraculously understand the situation when it's you who is being asked to believe something just because?

So for now, prove to me that something cannot come nothing.

The burden of proof lies with he who asserts. You said "in this universe, something can come out of nothing".
So why should I be the one to bring proof?

Oahray: The burden of proof lies with he who asserts. You said "in this universe, something can come out of nothing".
So why should I be the one to bring proof?

Oh, pls answer, if nothing comes from nothing, where does God come from?

Oahray: The burden of proof lies with he who asserts. You said "in this universe, something can come out of nothing".
So why should I be the one to bring proof?

Hahahaha, so, you get how the burden of proof works?

So, tell me how the op is exempt from that rule?

ooman:

If nothing comes from nothing, where does God come from?

Now you are finally thinking!

God is the source of everything. He has always existed. No?

Now, how did the universe come about? From nothing? Atheists would like to think so. No?

Consider Einstein energy-mass relativity theory. E=mc^2.
A particle of mass 'm' would release energy 'E'. From that equation, a small particle can be converted to release a great amount of energy.

It also means great energy is required to make even a small particle.

Think of the universe. Its enormous. Imagine the amount of energy conversion required to make a single star.
But energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

It can only come from a pre-existing source of energy. In this case, God.

If you or any other atheist have a better explanation, do tell me.

Oahray: Now you are finally thinking!

God is the source of everything. He has always existed. No?

Now, how did the universe come about? From nothing? Atheists would like to think so. No?

Consider Einstein energy-mass relativity theory. E=mc^2.
A particle of mass 'm' would release energy 'E'. From that equation, a small particle can be converted to release a great amount of energy.

It also means great energy is required to make even a small particle.

Think of the universe. Its enormous. Imagine the amount of energy conversion required to make a single star.
But energy can neither be created nor destroyed.

It can only come from a pre-existing source of energy. In this case, God.

If you or any other atheist have a better explanation, do tell me.

Your sentence kills you. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, God is everlasting, Nothing comes from nothing. God is something, just where does he come from. Who made God and who made he who made God and that continues forever except you put God out of your head

Bros, answer me...

wiegraf:

Hahahaha, so, you get how the burden of proof works?

So, tell me how the op is exempt from that rule?

The op said no one should say there is no God.
Many atheists do not only doubt the existence of God, they actively assert that God does not exist. That requires proof too. That was the point the op raised.

So how did the op seem exempt huh? Tell me.

ooman:

Your sentence kills you. Energy cannot be created or destroyed, God is everlasting, Nothing comes from nothing. God is something, just where does he come from. Who made God and who made he who made God and that continues forever except you put God out of your head

God is everlasting. You cannot possibly grasp it. Sue me.

While you are suing me tell us where the energy that made the universe come from.
Something has always existed. Something has to exist for the universe to come out of it.

Oahray: God is everlasting. You cannot possibly grasp it. Sue me.

While you are suing me tell us where the energy that made the universe come from.
Something has always existed. Something has to exist for the universe to come out of it.

At last you are thinking. Now we have reached an impasse. I think energy is eternal, you think God is eternal. If energy come from God, then energy is conscious because God is conscious. But in nature, we can't confirm the consciousness of energy. Nature disproves God.