De Beauvoir:

Definition of feminism;

fem·i·nism [fémmə nìzzəm]
noun
1. belief in women's rights: belief in the need to secure rights and opportunities for women equal to those of men, or a commitment to securing these
2. movement for women's rights: the movement committed to securing and defending rights and opportunities for women that are equal to those of men

You are not a feminist.

carujmonella: It's not impossible. I'm PRO-feminist to a great extent. I support sane unbiased feminist.

carujmonella:

. That sister thread was something else. Unfortunately, I was among the rot that derailed the thread. I plead guilty

axion:
Guy you don't seem to be making sense. Where did I discredit MLK? I said it is off point, not that she's wrong. I hope you can comprehend simple statements in English?

Idowuogbo:
Nice one! 1-0

I'll get U bck.

axion: You cannot call yourself a feminist and/or say you support feminism yet you dont find it rational or plausible.

Feminism is one movement, you're either in or out. Those that are out are either against or indifferent.

Feminism is one. You can't make up your own ideas about what feminism is, based on some wrong ideas you have imagined or observed, and then try to pass it off as facts.

axion:
Exactly. That's strawman's logic for you.

De Beauvoir:

Hey, good to see you again

No, I am not participating in the discussion. I have no interest in discussing with the anti-feminists on the thread, they have nothing to offer that I haven't seen before.

Idowuogbo:
Boy?

I'm seeing things o!

carujmonella:
Lol. Why the definition of feminism?. Didn't I define it in the sister thread?. Did I tell you I don't know the definition of feminism? . [size=13pt]Lemme repeat myself, the EQUALITY that feminist seek for DOESNT EXIST[/size]. How is it hard to read what I've been saying since?. [size=13pt]EQUALITY IS A FARCE[/size]. Wake up and seek for JUSTICE!!. And oh, I didn't say I'm a feminists, I said I'm a PRO-FEMINIST to a great extent(a sane feminist, for the reasonable peeps). In case you've decided to ignore my posts here is my post↓↓↓↓



[size=13pt]And please if I claim to be a feminist who doesn't believe in some unrealistic principles of feminism, how does that not make me a feminist?[/size]. Because muslim women wear hijab to play football, does it make them not be female footballers? . Tsk tsk..

Mrs.Chima:


I agree that people do not understand what feminism is about.

I read from some dummies who thought feminism was about lesbanism. I also read from some dummies that feminism is aboit emasculating men.

Nothing worst than a dummy with a college degree and still can't read a dictionary properly.

carujmonella:

Nope.. She and you are wrong. One can be feminist and still choose what and what principle to support


Example:

Are female muslims who wear hijab to play football not female footballers simply cause they cover their head while majority if not all, doest wear hijab?. By supporting her, are you not implying that female muslims who doesn't follow the ways of the majority female football are not footballers?

Mrs.Chima:


I agree that people do not understand what feminism is about.

I read from some dummies who thought feminism was about lesbanism. I also read from some dummies that feminism is aboit emasculating men.

Nothing worst than a dummy with a college degree and still can't read a dictionary properly.

Mrs.Chima:


You can't support something and then say it is not realistic. It's like saying scrotums are good but a nuisance.

You are either for it or against it. In some cases, you are neutral.

axion:
Guy you don't seem to be making sense. Where did I discredit MLK? I said it is off point, not that she's wrong. I hope you can comprehend simple statements in English?

Mrs.Chima:


No I am not wrong. You are fighting against progress and I am not interested.

Idowuogbo:
Hahahahaha

axion: Mrs Chima.

The argument on MLK broadly applies to race discussions, but why bring that up as a riposte on a thread on feminism? My point was: it's ironic for someone against feminism to be benefitting from it. Her response was: but without MLK we won't be here. Duh! It's off point, and even if it's not off point, she is thus supporting me that it's similarly ironic to - so to say - be biting the hand that fed you.

axion: Mrs Chima.

The argument on MLK broadly applies to race discussions, but why bring that up as a riposte on a thread on feminism? My point was: it's ironic for someone against feminism to be benefitting from it. Her response was: but without MLK we won't be here. Duh! It's off point, and even if it's not off point, she is thus supporting me that it's similarly ironic to - so to say - be biting the hand that fed you.

Mrs.Chima:


Maybe the poster didn't articulate the point concisely as you would like however the analogy regards to MLK fought for racial equality is the same as women fighting for gender equality.

It's about fighting for equality period.

carujmonella:

The guru behind human rights for both female and male genders should be written off/off point? . Dude, when are you going to start making sense

y-fo:


Already clicked 'like' before I noticed the smiley....what ya mean huh

Idowuogbo:
Buhahahahaha.. Irony!

De Beauvoir:

Wow, mrs chima you're so badass....I'm really loving your dismissive attitude right now .

Idowuogbo:
BULLSHYTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mrs.Chima:


I am deathly blunt and don't have time.to baby posters.

Truth hurts but it's necessary...do you agree?

Mrs.Chima:


No I am not wrong. You are fighting against progress and I am not interested.

axion: Mrs Chima.

The argument on MLK broadly applies to race discussions, but why bring that up as a riposte on a thread on feminism? My point was: it's ironic for someone against feminism to be benefitting from it. Her response was: but without MLK we won't be here. Duh! It's off point, and even if it's not off point, she is thus supporting me that it's similarly ironic to - so to say - be biting the hand that fed you.

Mrs.Chima:


Maybe the poster didn't articulate the point concisely as you would like however the analogy regards to MLK fought for racial equality is the same as women fighting for gender equality.

It's about fighting for equality period..

axion:
Again, this is not a thread about racial segregation so why should a sensible person use it as a riposte to my premise on the irony of educated women that are against feminism?

Mrs.Chima:


Maybe the poster didn't articulate the point concisely as you would like however the analogy regards to MLK fought for racial equality is the same as women fighting for gender equality.

It's about fighting for equality period..

Idowuogbo:
BULLSHYTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!