Stats: 3,178,399 members, 7,904,491 topics. Date: Monday, 29 July 2024 at 02:22 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / The Emerging Conversation (3246 Views)
Conversation Between A Muslim And A American Over Terrorists Issue! / CHRISLAM !!!!!: One World Religion Emerging. / Conversation Between An Atheist Professor And His Student (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: The Emerging Conversation by nlMediator: 4:23am On Jun 20, 2011 |
seyibrown: The level of waste going on in churches is shocking. In terms of time, energy and resources. That's what happens with the one-man founder churches of today where each person is interested in building an empire. You go to church and a lot of what you hear is how the church is growing or plans to grow. Of course, the growth is not real growth based primarily on conversion of souls. It's just recycling of members from Church A to Church B. Instead of churches in the same area combining to run programs, you have unnecessary repetition and competition. Each year, every minsistry proclaims huge success. Each year, things stay the same or worse in their vicinity. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Zikkyy(m): 9:26am On Jun 20, 2011 |
Joagbaje: Joagbaje: I like to ask, is this (perfection of saints) likely to occur in anybody's life time? Joagbaje: I think these offices were more useful in the era of the apostles, why? there were no NT documentations at the time ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 9:37am On Jun 20, 2011 |
Joagbaje: where you are alone, he is there also. That doesn't make up for the church.I hope you understand that Jesus was talking about fellowship there and the importance of it for worship and for acheiving goals. Even where there is nobody around Christ is there too. 19Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven. 20For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. Matthew 18 Hebrews 10:25Agreed, but it doesn't say that the church meetings must be colossal affairs in great big buildings. 2 or 3 people can encourage and warn each other. In fact in a big institution you are more likely to get lost in the crowd and nobody knows your business and nobody encourages or upbraids you. I said:Besides you are still lost on this idea that the church is a building and a man made institutions. To which you respond. Can you quote where I said that?I said you were lost in the idea of church being an building and man made institution because you say things like this: That's not what I meant. I'm talking about purpose and callings. 2 neighbours can just be meeting together to fellowship in a new shell estate because there is no church around. But that doesn't make for the church. They can't continue like that for too long. The church has purpose and structure. It is by the holyghost.I understand that where there are christians there is church, cos christians are the church. So how can there be no church around where there are 2 neighbours who are christians, unless you mean something different by church. The only other thing that I can imagine you are saying is that there is no registered church with a building and an institutional 'structure and purpose'. Am I wrong? If so, please correct me. 2 people can't fulfil the purpose of the church. The two are part of a whole. But when you disconnect the 2 from a whole. Something is wrong.somebody is missing something.1000 people can't fulfil the purpose of the church either, unless they have the holy spirit. It is not the number of people. If there is need for prophecy in an area and there are only 3 people in the church there it is nothing for the spirit to inspire one of them to start prophesying if he hasn't before. Or to send a new member with the gift of prophecy. The church is worldwide and it is only fellowships that are limited to an area. Just as, i guess to use the imagery of 1Cor 12, the eyes are located in the head while the toes are located on the feet and the liver and kidneys etc each have where they are located yet they work together to fulfill the purpose of one living church. When you leave topic and start getting personal , I begin to wonder. Sir, you said one has to be called to be in the ministry. I happen to know that you are in a ministry. I asked you what the criteria was for knowing that you are called. This is another of the many questions I've been asking of you since and I am yet to receive a response to any of them. What better way to demonstrate the criteria of knowing you are called than you use yourself as an example. If you find it too personal can you then simply tell us in general terms how one is to know that he is called and how the rest of us are to know too. I don't think that has left the topic at all, you brought it up right within the topic. I don't get you here , you're not saying anythingOkay o, leave that part. You're looking puzzled when I tell you to go and rest cos you are tired. Did I not warn you not to put words in my mouth, like you poodle Deepsight was wont to do. Remember I said: Please, don't do a deepsight on me. I never said anything about being tired, offended, or discouraged. I said disillusioned. Disillusion is when you were once under an illusion and then the illusion is removed and you become dis-illusioned. It might have the effect of deflating you, or it might buoy you up. That depends on how you handle disillusionment.Yet you deliberately decided to keep on using the word tired. Plus you then open a new thread about needing to take a rest. If you don't know it then let me give you the diagnosis of why. I say it is because you have a weariness in your soul, and it is been expressed subliminally. Am I wrong? I'll accept the possibility that I am wrong, at the end of the day it is your life and you know about it best. But sha, the bottomline of all that is please don't put words in my mouth. I never mentioned anything about being tired. Speak for yourself. You can speak for yourself alone.Why did you stop going to church? What kind of church? This answer will determin if the problem is your church, or your pastor or even you.I can see that this is going to be a sticking point for you if I don't answer it, even though it is one of the things that I was determined not to answer on NL. I am C of E, denominationally speaking. Happy? [b]Christ is building his church. [/b]He wants to perfect the saints unto maturity. Bring born again is only a starting point and not an end on it's own. That's why he has given certain offices as gifts to perfect the saints.everyone could have prayed at home and read the bible. But it will not suffice. You need the body. You need the ministry gifts. The church needs to grow into fullness of christ. You are saying that the purpose of the church is to build the church. I guess you're right. And the purpose of a dog is to be a dog. and the purpose of dinner is to dine. Let us have dinner in order to dine. Menh, you are just talking abstract nonsense. 'perfecting saints into maturity'. What do mature saints do? What does the church do? Did Jesus not say that the kingdom will be like a great tree when matured and even the birds will find shelter under it? He set another parable before them, saying, "The Kingdom of Heaven is like a grain of mustard seed, which a man took, and sowed in his field; which indeed is smaller than all seeds. But when it is grown, it is greater than the herbs, and becomes a tree, so that the birds of the air come and lodge in its branches." – Matthew 13:31–32 The entire purpose of Jesus ministry is to fulfill the law and the apex of the Law is Love God, and Love your neighbour. How we love our neighbour is amply explained in the parable of the good Samaritan. How we love God is amply explained here: 34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’ |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 9:42am On Jun 20, 2011 |
yommyuk: The size of the gathering has nothing to do with it's validity. What matters is if Christ is present with them. In fact undesirable leaven is more likely to enter into a big church unnoticed. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 9:50am On Jun 20, 2011 |
I think it is important to realise that the Emerging conversation is not a fixed body with an ideology and a system in place. It is simply a conversation, a dialogue across denominational lines, across ideological lines, and across any other lines that might separate two people. I believe it is being very much facilitated by the internet where people can talk without consideration for their social position or social status. This allows for a more honest interaction. There are, for instance, on NL many atheists who would not dare tell their parents or communities that they are atheist. However online they can express what they really feel without fear. Some even used to get threathened by christians on NL, but the threats were ultimately futile because you cannot stigmatize a guy if you do not actually know who he is. These dialogues are, I believe, one of the fuels that are driving the emerging church. I very much liken it to the effect of the printing press and what that did to religious thought in Europe. Printing even served to bring down Monarchies and governments too. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by MyJoe: 11:18am On Jun 20, 2011 |
Pastor AIO:I think it would be more accurate to say they came out of the same source, since a distinction should be made between the Seventh-Day Adventist Church and the original Adventist movement, known as Millerite Adventism or Second Adventism. The founder of the JW was closely associated with, and was heavily influenced by, the the Millerites. But note that while almost of all his initial associates were Millerite Adventist Ministers, he himself was not, he was never even baptised as an Adventist. In fact, it is difficult to pin him to any church since he rejected the conventional Protestant teachings of his Presbyterian heritage (he was of Scottish-descent) at an early age and studied the Bible on his own - he was an "emerging Christian" through and through. ![]() The Seventh-Day Adventist Church grew out of Millerite Adventism and is recognised as a part of the Adventist Movement. It is said that the spirit and precepts of William Miller (Adventist founder) live on in the Seventh Day Adventist Church, who admit it, and the JW, who don't. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by nuclearboy(m): 2:50pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
2 people AND God make up a Church. 3,000 people worshipping their own "perceptions" and "lusts" and clapping excitedly make for entertainment. Christ has settled this argument when He said true worshipers would do so in spirit and truth rather than in any specific place. By the way, is it just me or did others notice Pastor posted 7 questions which "cannot" be answered but were rather dodged? Which makes me wonder - what do you call a building containing congregants led by non-christians who teach from the Bible? |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by KunleOshob(m): 3:25pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
@Joagbaje Ansa PastorAIO's kweshun na! Else you would loose the tiny little dignity you have left on this forum. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 4:07pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
Pastor AIO: Further to what I wrote in this post there is a very interesting lecture on Language and Social relationships that throws further light on my point. Especially around 8:20 of the lecture where he talks about people gathering to topple a dictator. The Royal Society always have interesting lectures and it is worth checking out their websites for more things like this. Thersa.org I also love the way they animate the lectures. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-son3EJTrU My point is that with the internet people can freely express how much they loathe the dictator without fear of reprisals and this is doing a lot to topple regimes. Just look at the middle east. Those guys got organized online. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by nuclearboy(m): 4:51pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
^ Sir: Are you not a tad too harsh on DeepSight? He never claimed any moral code, you know? |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 4:55pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 5:42pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
nuclearboy: That's his own business. You don't need a moral code to know that if you put your hand in a lion's mouth, the lion will bite it off. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by nuclearboy(m): 10:34pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
^^ Pastor_LION ![]() ![]() Hehehehe ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by seyibrown(f): 11:37pm On Jun 20, 2011 |
nuclearboy: At bolded: Many of them are called CATHEDRALS! ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Tonyet1(m): 2:04pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
@PastorAIO, hmmm pastor pastor ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() But you see, this is where you and I might be getting it wrong ![]() Someone reading your intro-post will quickly want to identify themselves with the EC movement especially seeing how you sugar coated the movement making it look like the "21st saint church" raised to fight the "denominational church" as you might call it, not taking time to understand the intricacies involved with this supposed movement - EC. I will love to liken the EC movement to be a "white washed sepulchre - Matt.23:27" - It looks appealing and beautiful from the outside but inside is filled with dead men's bones ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Tonyet1(m): 2:27pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
. . .accept it or not!. . .every movement has its pioneers - leaders as others might call them. I laugh when I read folks saying this "new wave of christians" do not have men as leaders amongst them, it gets my mind wondering if no one ever talked to anyone about the idea of coming together. ![]() These pioneers may not necessarily have originated this movement, but the fact that they spearhead it will show them as frontrunners or better still light bearers in this "saint movement". Now this is the onus, to understand the intentions of a movement, simple wisdom will demand that you check the idealogies and teachings of their "pioneers"/"leaders"/"light-bearers". . .now lets go there. . . 1st case study: (*Steve Chalke and Alan Mann, The Lost Message of Jesus, pp. 182-183.) *Steve Chalke and Alan Mann are both strong leaders of the EC movement. Written in their book I'll like to quote "If the cross is a personal act of violence perpetrated by God towards humankind but borne by his Son, then it makes a mockery of Jesus’ own teaching to love your enemies and to refuse to repay evil with evil.” This single quote sparked so much razzmatazz amongst their keen and staunch admirers such that it was ascribed the title of "the new solid scholarship" . .why wont it? afterall the ECs messages always come as sweet and appealing to man's ears. . .little wonder their massive followership. But the falsehood in these ECs movement is that they'll only give you their "new discoveries" and hide the truth that exposes their "fallacious truth". . .I call it the obama strategy - making a mess of bush's leadership by taking advantages of Bush's mistakes to gain new followers for his hidden cruelty. Now see, while the celebration was going on amongst the EC faithfuls, some other christians (bereans) were searching the scriptures to verify the genuity of this Steve Chalke's "new solid scholarship" and not too long it was discovered where Paul wrote in 1Cor. 2:2, “For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.” and 1cor.1:23 - "For I paul will always preach Jesus crucified". And when these scholars where approached to clerify themselves and their stance on this Scriptures, Alan Mann wrote in defense "Whoever believes God would kill someone to save others has simply ascribe God a murderer". Alan Jones also wrote in defense that the substitutionary death of Christ to appease an angry God was a “vile doctrine”! He wrote, “The other thread of just criticism addresses the suggestion implicit in the cross that Jesus’ sacrifice was to appease an angry god. Penal substitution [Christ’s death on the Cross] was the name of this vile doctrine.” He continued: “The Church’s fixation on the death of Jesus as the universal saving act must end, and the place of the cross must be reimagined in Christian faith ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Men's pride will never allow them admit their mistakes. . .takes us back to my quote of Proverbs.21:2 - "Everyman wants to always believes he is right" What else can I say of this Emerging church or Emergent church. May God help. . .I'll continue later! |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 5:41pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
@Tonye, it seems you have been doing some research. I am not aware of this schalke guy or Alan Mann neither. Could you kindly give us the link to the websites where you got all this information from so that I can have a look at it too and get a better idea where it is all coming from. Like I said before, it is a conversation and there are many varied viewpoints in the conversation. There isn't a fixed ideology that every body in the Emerging movement is embracing. If there are outlandish claims then it is up to everybody as a community to discuss and refute the claims. I don't know how I sugar-coated anything. I said things the way that I perceived them. I said that it was messy. The links that I put up on the subject contained criticisms as well as expositionary information. For example in the first video with Mark Driscoll speaking (go and watch it again) he mentions that he does not agree with the Emergent Church's strand of doctrines. I understand that you need to simplify this and put it in one box so that you can attack it easier, but I'm afraid it is not such an easy thing to classify. By the way, what do you have to say about my response on the whole Laodicean huu-har. You haven't addressed that. In fact I suggest that you stop posting stuff as if it is your opinion that you've thought about yourself and just post us the links of the website that is doing your thinking for you so that we can all go and check it out comprehensively. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by JeSoul(f): 5:59pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
I've been following the thread and will continue. But quick comment . . . Am I missing something, or does it appear the: "Emerging Church" as a concept, new approach gaining traction around the globe in independent minds [/i]Pastor_LIO (I think) is talking about is different from the [i]"Emerging Church" as an already existing establishment/group complete with leaders that Enigma and others are talking about? |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 6:13pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
JeSoul: Thank you for that observation, JeSoul. The establishment that they are all mostly attacking, I believe, is the Emergent Village. I think watching the Mark Driscoll link on my 3rd post will make the situation a lot clearer. This is not a single monolithic movement, though I suspect that many of it's critics wish it were so. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by JeSoul(f): 6:22pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
^Phew! okay I'm not crazy. lol. Pastor AIO:Gbam! that is what I thought you were saying. And from what I have been thinking you're saying - it would even appear that we (with all these online discussions and questioning of the established 'church' denominations/practices) are all part of this emerging church? (pls tell me if I'm going off). |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Enigma(m): 6:43pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
JeSoul: Erm no, Jesoul! The only two posts I've made have been directed at the emerging/emergent church and in both contexts you identify --- I have deliberately not focused on the emergent village of which I'm aware. Even if this "new approach" is classified as a "conversation", many of the strands of the conversation are not new at all --- and they are issues which people have been wrestling with for sometime. I notice for example a video posted of Billy Graham saying some none Christians are part of the "body of Christ" (though misrepresented by some as him saying "Jesus is not the only way" ![]() If the focus is on "conversation" no problem, the conversation has always been there and maybe is now more prominent. However, aside the "conversation", I think it is undeniable that there is an emerging church "movement" (assuming we even separate it from "emergent" ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by JeSoul(f): 6:51pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
^In-law, got it. Sorry just put ur name there first in front of 'and others' randomly. Oyaa . . . Tonye and others ![]() |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 6:52pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
Okay, I'd never heard of this Steve Chalke guy, but I've now googled him and this is what I found. No mention of the Emerging movement or of the Emergent village.
Chalke was ordained as a Baptist Minister in 1981, having studied at Spurgeon's Theological College in London, and was a local minister of Tonbridge Baptist Church in Kent for four years before setting up the Oasis Trust. More recently Chalke founded Church.co.uk,[3] a developing network of community churches around the UK which began with the formation of Church.co.uk in Waterloo, central London in 2003 and now includes churches in Salford, Enfield, Bristol and a growing number of other locations. Chalke still serves as the senior minister of the central London church in Waterloo.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Chalke I don't know what church.co.uk are about. this is what Wikipedia says about them, which is all I've found out. Church.co.ukhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church.co.uk To be honest, it sounds vague to me. Church.co.uk sounds more like a youth club to me that is affiliated to church. The church Christ Church and Upton is the combination of a baptist church and a United Reformed church. Christ Church was rebuilt on a smaller scale in the late 1950s and early 1960s, following the destruction of the original church during the Second World War, and was combined with Upton Chapel (Baptist), which had also been destroyed during the war (the Lambeth Road Upton Chapel had been built in 1862, providing a purpose-built chapel for baptist meetings that had been originated in 1785 by James Upton).http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_Church,_Lambeth Perhaps if Tonye is looking for a religious body to attack he can attack the Baptist church for producing such a minister. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Enigma(m): 7:06pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
JeSoul: Nne, you know I was going to make a post asking abi whether you mixed my posts up with that of someone else (and "heaven forfend" ![]() ![]() PS my post about Billy Graham that I referred to was actually made in late 2005 (I just checked) Re Steve Chalke, he used to be more frequent on regular UK TV (including popular/populist programmes like Songs of Praise) years ago and is well known in UK evangelical circles. EDIT ETA Cross reference re Steve Chalke etc https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-696444.0.html#msg8587816 |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 7:12pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
JeSoul: Exactly! This is something that is just happening and there is no one that is 'leading' us here on NL to ask those questions. I was not even aware that there was such a thing as the 'emerging conversation' until about a couple of weeks ago. I thought that I was all alone. Well . . . not all alone but you get what I mean. I didn't realise that it was prominent enough for people to give it a name. But I was aware that there was something brewing. I just didn't know to what extent. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by JeSoul(f): 7:18pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
Enigma: ![]() ![]() PS my post about Billy Graham that I referred to was actually made in late 2005 (I just checked)I know nothing about this guy as well . . . infact this whole emerging thing . . . dat's why I just dey read and learn. Pastor AIO:Ha! So does Baba Junior Tonye realize that he too is unknowingly part of this 'emerging church' - especially since he opened a thread like this not long ago ![]() My Fear For Pentecostalism. . .will She Last? https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-564033.0.html |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 7:52pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
I really hope the following does not derail the topic, but I just want to show the theological complications of the issue of atonement. If this issue grows wings and starts to fly, I'll take it to another thread. Even the whole atonement, and the mechanism of it is something that is much discussed and argued over in theology. It seems that some peoples mechanistic idea of the trinity “It cannot be separated in any way” is behind at least part of the disagreement with penal substitution which is rampant these days. Spurgeon would have had exactly the same things to say about the people today who deny the plain teaching of scripture that Christ bore in his body the punishment due for our sin. And yes, Steve Chalke is among the number of those who deny this teaching (follow the link for more information)http://adrianwarnock.com/2005/10/arguing-about-atonement/ and more . . . THE MEANING OF THE DEATH OF CHRISThttp://www.the-highway.com/articleJuly02.html The above is John Calvin's view. Going back 2,000 years plenty of ink has flowed on this topic. It is not helped by the fact that in the bible itself there appears to be contradictions about this business of atonement/forgiveness. Check out Jesus' own words at the sermon of the mount. Jesus teaches his disciples how to pray: 12And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. 13And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: 14For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you: 15But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses. Matt 6 Imagine Jesus said that and one of the disciples said, 'o come off it, rabbi, that's just not true' Surprised Jesus responds,'Why do you say that?' and he says," Cos you'll die brutally in a couple of years and then my heavenly father will forgive me on account of that and that alone." (sticks out his tongue at Jesus). This presents a totally different principle of forgiveness from that of the crucifixion. And it is not only in one place. It is a principle that Jesus reiterates over and over again. 35 "But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Highest. For He is kind to the unthankful and evil. 36 "Therefore be merciful, just as your Father also is merciful. 37 "Judge not, and you shall not be judged. Condemn not, and you shall not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven. 38 "Give, and it will be given to you: good measure, pressed down, shaken together, and running over will be put into your bosom. For with the same measure that you use, it will be measured back to you." This passage lends weight to Chalke's argument come to think of it because Chalke argues that, how can a God that demands that we be forgiving insist that he must wreak vengeance on someone for our sins. If we must be merciful just as Our Father is merciful then Jesus is saying that we must get an eye for an eye, and if we don't get the eye of the person that offended us then the eye of somebody else will do. You see how complicated this issue is. Of course there is Romans chapter 1 and chapter 3 verse 25: 25Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; So the exercise is, how do we reconcile this with what Jesus taught? 35 "So My heavenly Father also will do to you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother his trespasses." Matt 18. also this: For He is kind to the unthankful and evil. Suggests a contradiction with Romans Chapter one. 18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 1 Like |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by InesQor(m): 7:57pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
This is interesting. I am subscribing, and will return to say my piece. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Joagbaje(m): 8:31pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
Zikkyy: It continues from one level of glory to a higher level of glory till Jesus comes. I think these offices were more useful in the era of the apostles, why? there were no NT documentations at the time It's not about letters of the scriptures. They had scriptures to read. Paul told Timothy to study. Paul himself studied till he died. 2 Timothy 4:13 13 The cloke that I left at Troas with Carpus, when thou comest, bring with thee, and the books, but especially the parchments. It's like role of parents . You don't become parents by study . It's an office . You lead ,teach guide the children. Ministry is of the holyghost. In our ever changing world, ministry also has evolved. We have modern day apostles still perfecting the saints in the post modern society |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 8:43pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
After 2000 years we must be so much more perfect than the disciples of Jesus now. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by Joagbaje(m): 10:41pm On Jun 21, 2011 |
Pastor AIO: Thst still doesnt make ip for pastoral role.Children who grow up by themselves on the street can't be compared to children who are raised and guided by parents [quite] 19Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven. 20For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. Matthew 18 [/quote] It's not about the size, it's obout oversight. God leads by the head. Gives direction. Guides. Etc. The holyghost lead the church through ministry gift offices. We may have fragments of small group meetings. But still be part of a whole under a head. The headship thing is want Satan is fighting. One of the things the spirit of zgod will want to teach anyone first is how to be under authority. I have come across many people,ladies particularly who co stanly have problems in relationship . Many as I discovered who grew up alone find it hard to submit to anyone because they never had anyone who raised them up. They contend with authorities . That's what happens to many people who haven't been spiritually raised also. They want freedom because they can't be under spiritual authorities . They rather attack spiritual authorities . 1 Peter 5:5 Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble. Hebrews 13:17 Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you. I said:Besides you are still lost on this idea that the church is a building and a man made institutions. To which you respond.I said you were lost in the idea of church being an building and man made institution because you say things like this:I understand that where there are christians there is church, cos christians are the church. So how can there be no church around where there are 2 neighbours who are christians, unless you mean something different by church. The only other thing that I can imagine you are saying is that there is no registered church with a building and an institutional 'structure and purpose'. Am I wrong? If so, please correct me. There are offices in the body to perfect the church. Especially the office of the pastor. A christian can't be the pastor to his neighbour. It is an office . Sir, you said one has to be called to be in the ministry. I happen to know that you are in a ministry. I asked you what the criteria was for knowing that you are called. This is another of the many questions I've been asking of you since and I am yet to receive a response to any of them. What better way to demonstrate the criteria of knowing you are called than you use yourself as an example. If you find it too personal can you then simply tell us in general terms how one is to know that he is called and how the rest of us are to know too. I don't think that has left the topic at all, you brought it up right within the topic. There are three or four kinds of pastors but I will sumarise two. The first one are those who are called in a spectacular way, like Saul , by vision, by the voice of God etc. There are others who may not hear a voice but just have strong burden for people , growth, care, they just have passion and burden for others to help them grow, and these people ,no matter their vocation,job or business ,they have more fulfilment in counselling people and helping them grow. It is a sign of a call most probably. some are called to be under shepherd . They function as shepherd under another. 1 Timothy 3:1 This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. People like Timothy,Titus ,pricilla and Aquila fall into this category they didn't receive call in a spectacular way they may have jobs and businesses but given such pastoral responsibility because of the grace and burden upon them for people. Philippians 2:19-21 But I trust in the Lord Jesus to send Timotheus shortly unto you, that I also may be of good comfort, when I know your state. 20 For I have no man likeminded, who will naturally care for your state. 21 For all seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's. I can see that this is going to be a sticking point for you if I don't answer it, even though it is one of the things that I was determined not to answer on NL. What is C of E? You are saying that the purpose of the church is to build the church. I guess you're right. And the purpose of a dog is to be a dog. and the purpose of dinner is to dine. Let us have dinner in order to dine. . . ."I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it". Don't use logic for spiritual things .The church is perfected for work of ministry.spiritual maturity is for responsibility. the church ordained to edify itself . And also we have the responsibility of evangelism . Turning men from darkness to light Evangelism Is the primary responsibility of the church. We are edifiied to reach the world for Christ. |
Re: The Emerging Conversation by PastorAIO: 7:10am On Jun 22, 2011 |
Joagbaje: Nothing you have said above tells me why the only place you are allowed to worship is in a registered church building.
I have come across many people,ladies particularly who co stanly have problems in relationship .Yes, I've heard that this is a common problem in Christ Embasssy. Please you didn't answer my question of whether the Lutheran reformation was a rebellion. And also whether all the subsequent protestant movements were rebellions, and if not, then tell me, what head where they following? There are offices in the body to perfect the church. Especially the office of the pastor. A christian can't be the pastor to his neighbour. It is an office .But can a pastor have a neighbour that is a christian? Please answer that question and then tell me if your reasoning in the above quote makes sense. If you insist that it makes sense then please break it down for me because it sounds like tongues to me.
This sounds like what I say when I say that christians, all christians, should pastor one another. What is C of E? Church of England
Evidently you have taken your own advice and abandoned logic a long time ago. |
A Reply To Vick$rill's Thread: A Big Thank You To Kingebukanaija, Winer01 And... / Gay Church / Who Killed More People In The Bible?
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 192 |