Joezinho:


Salah wasn’t a very good player when he was at Chelsea. If you remember vividly, his first good season was with Fiorentina in 2015.

Was Mourinho supposed to play him every week in 2013, even though he was rubbish, and risk getting sacked, so Chelsea could potentially have a good player years later?

It was the same with De Bruyne. He wanted to play every week. But he wasn’t good enough to play every week then, for a team that whose manager was expected to win the PL/CL or lose his job. Weird to blame their sales on Mourinho. Abramovich makes developing players impossible.

It’s normal, managers hit and miss.

jihday:
he never said this, just some jobless blogs carrying fake news

TheGoodJoe:


All those one is story. Mourinho could not use De Bruyne and could not see his quality. If De Bruyne was with Guardiola then, he will do wonders with him, just as he is doing with Foden.

charlesemeka85:
the same Abraham lampard during his time as Chelsea coach labeled him a championship striker?

If he was good as you stated why did Chelsea discard him just to bring in lukaku? Even it got to a point in the club last season where he was benched for almost 3 months without playing

TheGoodJoe:


Mourinho pursued Salah from the club. He did not know how good Salah or De Bruyne were, even though he trained them daily. Mata was the best player in Chelsea for two seasons and Mourinho kicked him out of the club.

If it was Guardiola with Mata and doing well, you will say he is shining with a ready made player. Mourinho can enter Manchester City and say Bernardo Silva is too light weight for his football.

Give Guardiola his props. He has done well.

Guardiola has over performed, that is why him making champions League final and Semi Final looks poor. He has set a high standard.

komekn:


And what happened to Lampard he got sacked.

Tuchel did not bring in Lukaku.

Tuchel refused to play Tega Abraham and put in his place Werner and Havertz. That season 2020/21 Kai Havertz who cost £72 million scored 4 goals after 27 games and much more game time also Timo Werner who cost £50 million played 35 games with much more game time scored 6 goals.

That season after just 22 games mainly as a substitute and with about 35% of the game time of Timo Werner still scored 6 goals in the EPL.

The previous season Teha Abraham had scored 15 goals the highest goal tally by a Chelsea striker since the days of Conte.

To date Kai Havertz and Timo Werner have been unable to match the goal tally of Tega Abraham.

Sometimes football defies rational look at the transfer fee of Timo and Kai £50 and £72 million. But both of them have never been better than Tega Abraham in any way shape or form. Meanwhile Tega cost Roma a mere £34 million.

Tuchel was biased and there seemed to be other preferences beyond football for his two German country men.

Now they bought Lukaku and that has just been shambolic management by Tuchel can't see him lasting another season.

PDPGuy:
Osimhen has reportedly picked Arsenal ahead of Man Utd….

TheGoodJoe:


Forget bias. People have preferences. I will play Werner anyday over Tammy Abraham upfront. I believe you will play Tammy over Werner. It is preference in style, not bias to the player.

komekn:


That's bias not preference it's not anchored on objectivity and player outcome delivery.

Because Tega is COMPREHENSIVELY better than Werner on all fronts.

komekn:


That's bias not preference it's not anchored on objectivity and player outcome delivery.

Because Tega is COMPREHENSIVELY better than Werner on all fronts.

komekn:


That's bias not preference it's not anchored on objectivity and player outcome delivery.

Because Tega is COMPREHENSIVELY better than Werner on all fronts.

Joezinho:


Mou loves managing underdog teams, he was the manager at FC Porto when Benefica were ruling, he managed Chelsea when Man united and arsenal were winning, he managed Inter when AC Milan were kings of Europe and Italy, he managed Madrid when Barca had the best team of Europe or any club( only behind AC Milan's legendary team under sacchi) even though managing underdog teams he brought out the best in them and brought silverware.

This is one thing I don't think Apariola will be able to achieve.

Joezinho:


Mou loves managing underdog teams, he was the manager at FC Porto when Benefica were ruling, he managed Chelsea when Man united and arsenal were winning, he managed Inter when AC Milan were kings of Europe and Italy, he managed Madrid when Barca had the best team of Europe or any club( only behind AC Milan's legendary team under sacchi) even though managing underdog teams he brought out the best in them and brought silverware.

This is one thing I don't think Apariola will be able to achieve.

TheGoodJoe:


I hope you remember Mancini won the Italian Serie A repeatedly with Inter Milan before Mourinho came in. I think that was after Benitez took over the Champions League. When Mourinho joined Inter Milan, they were the Kings. Not AC Milan.

TheGoodJoe:


Mancini won the Serie A three times straight with Inter Milan. Note.

Joezinho:


But how did he fare in Europe?

TheGoodJoe:


Football is unpredicatable.

Mourinho could not do it in Chelsea, despite putting in a lot. Went to Inter and it worked for him. That is football. It is not power. You just do your best.

Joezinho:


Well, so far, Guardiola worked with the best teams that can achieve what they achieved with Guardiola without Guardiola as well.

On the other hand, Porto and Inter?

There were managers like Guus Hiddink who increased the level of average teams they inherited, Mourinho may be asserted to be like them but not Guardiola.

TheGoodJoe:


Barcelona was trophyless for two seasons when Guardiola took over. Sevilla beat them home and away. They were a mess when Guardiola came and turned them to the greatest club team in the history of football. Nothing Hiddink or any coach can ever be compared to that.

Guardiola changed football forever. Transformed football in Spain, Germany and England. Has the whole world copying his coaching methods.

He is amazing.

Joezinho:


Mou loves managing underdog teams, he was the manager at FC Porto when Benefica were ruling, he managed Chelsea when Man united and arsenal were winning, he managed Inter when AC Milan were kings of Europe and Italy, he managed Madrid when Barca had the best team of Europe or any club( only behind AC Milan's legendary team under sacchi) even though managing underdog teams he brought out the best in them and brought silverware.

This is one thing I don't think Apariola will be able to achieve.

TheGoodJoe:


Barcelona was trophyless for two seasons when Guardiola took over. Sevilla beat them home and away. They were a mess when Guardiola came and turned them to the greatest club team in the history of football. Nothing of Hiddink or any coach can ever be compared to that.

Guardiola changed football forever. Transformed football in Spain, Germany and England. Has the whole world copying his coaching methods.

He is amazing.

Joezinho:


He had the most glittering generation of La Masian stars at his disposal, and definitely they did have a major role to play on his success.. Apart from shifting Messi in the center, he has not showed any tactical nous..

Rijkaard was the person who had formed the football philosophy..

andrewbaba44:


Stop capping that mourinho loves managing underdogs ,you must think we are kids here

He joined Chelsea because of oil money ,same thing you accuse guardiola of doing

I am sure if a coach takes Newcastle job tomorrow with 300 million available to spend you will open your mouth waaa and say the coach likes underdog just as mourinho took Chelsea job then

He managed inter when ac was king ,be deceiving yourself ,same inter that has won seria A 3 times in a roll before mourinho arrived

Mourinho was a nobody when he was a Porto manager which one is mourinho loves managing underdog ,as if that’s not the best job he could get then .

Madrid came for him 2010 and he went there ,why did he reject arsenal and some other teams not up to Madrid level ?

Be deceiving yourself when we all know mourinho accept a large offer from Abramovich to join Chelsea and we all know who was the number 1 spender then ,but you all pretend to forget just because you wanna troll guardiola

With all the money then why didn’t he deliver the champions league

andrewbaba44:


I won’t talk of Spain because even a blind man knows that ,but you that don’t watch football think it’s only transferring Messi to center

I am sure you are still blind about the changes of football in England

TFLASHOGEE:
oya don Andrew come and confirm this Sha na true say Barcelona was a mess true true abi na fake news from daily mail or marca

Joezinho:


Stop foaming in the mouth and answer this question. " Can Apariola build a squad with limited budget?"

andrewbaba44:


They didn’t win any trophy for 2 seasons though

Came 3rd with 10 point behind Villarreal before pep took over

Joezinho:


Oh, I forgot!! He went unbeaten all season.

TFLASHOGEE:
so truely they where mess according to blue font prof but I know say if na emekus call Barcelona mess you go don turn the meme below