ollah1:


What do you mean except barca? in 2009, Abidal got an undeserved straight red card in the first leg. Against inter, they scored an offside goal to make the score line 2 - 1 in a semi final match. Against United, Rooney scored an office goal to level scores in a final match. What would you say about these?

jodeer:
lolzzz...i dont remember abidal's red card so i wont comment on that. On an offside goal inter scored in 2010 is really false cos there isnt any offside goal(tho u can dis-prove me on that) it ended 3-1 in the fest leg. Then That rooney's goal in 2011 was neva an offside goal#fact#. But seriously barca is the most favored that somtims my brodas do call them "uefalona".

codedguy1:
Mourinho is a bloody coward! He is trying hard to get himself fired because he knows no matter what he says or does now, IF he eventually gets fired he will get a job sooner than we all think.

Abrahamovic should not sack him, let him prove to us all that he is truly the special one. Now is the time to re emphasis his status as a special coach/Manager.


He is looking for the easy way out.

All these being unlucky is just lame.

Chestar5:


dont mind dat man


he is using mind tricks for chelsea, he doesnt want to resign, he wants to get fired but i hope he wont get wat he wants

Chestar5:


dont mind dat man


he is using mind tricks for chelsea, he doesnt want to resign, he wants to get fired but i hope he wont get wat he wants

barackohandso:



Funny thing is they won't remember the ones that went against Barca. When people refer to the 2009 semis it's always the penalty calls Chelsea didn't get people remember, they forget barca had abidal wrongly sent off

Mourinholic:

How can you think like this?? Really??
Mourinho wants to get himself sacked? That's why he is losing??

Really

Even if all these are true, which is surely
not.... He shouldn't get sacked? You really
wanna taste life without Ucl

ollah1:


You and your fellow fans say the same thing without proves. Giggs was in an offside position when he gave Rooney the pass which he scored. Look it up and the other things i said

barackohandso:



Funny. We still hear these same lines after many years


So tell me what decision went against PSG in those games

Chestar5:


is mourinho a saint


Do u know d heart of man

Mourinho has nothing to lose one thing am sure...

And for chelsea, i know we can never taste relegation mayb ucl position is still in doubt but we survived @ europa 2013....

after the storm is a calm sky

Mourinholic:
I want to believe he is not that kinda person..... If he was,I don't think he would have returned to Chelsea after Madrid

Leyqute:


Which team has been awarded the highest number of penalties in UCL knockout stages in the past 5-10 years? Why do teams always get red-carded against Barcelona the most? Don't bring all that talk here. You know referee decisions have favored Barcelona a lot.

Now that Platini isn't there any more una go suffer well well.

raumdeuter:
How come its only EPL fans and team that are complaining about UEFA

We havent seen Chelsea fans complain that Oscar dived to get Zlatan sent off last season

They are used to whining. Someone asked why isnt Bayern complaining about Giroud scoring with his hand and I replied we Bayern fans dont moan about results

We leave that to lesser clubs like those EPL teams

Mourinholic:

Abidal wrongly sent off?? Are you kidding me?

What about Pique's handball? Eto's last minute save with his hand?
Yaya's foul on Drogba in the box?

No vex Me o......

coogar:


not all EPL fans, abeg....

it's baffling that chelsea fans are moaning about being unlucky? luck? what has luck gotta do with football? they were well beaten by barcelona in 2009. luck didn't score that goal for iniesta. messi teed him with a delicious pass & iniesta finished with aplomb.

in the other semis, they lost twice to liverpool. the ghost goal incident is a poor excuse. without the ghost goal, chelsea must score to advance to the final. they didn't score in 180 mins of the semis. what is unlucky about a team that failed to score a goal in both legs of a semifinal tie?

nateevs:
Abeg make una free Bimfo jor. He was only being very optimistic and positive about his team.

My gripe was where the optimism came from.

When the likes of Nateevs was screaming last season that we were stumbling along and just barely reaching the finish line, many thought I was looking for wahala where there existed none.

I cannot remember how many times I referred to our 'method of attack' and our increasing sole dependence on the brilliance of Hazard. I criticized JM many times for being too defence-centric in his approach to games.

I brought this up again in pre-season, highlighting how nothing had changed and how we may struggle this season. So it baffles me when I see such optimism being displayed.

And the reason I kept talking about this was simple. If you don't build a side that wins games on the back of the sheer amount of attacking chances created as a unit (not from the same individual time after time), when you need to score goals to get you out of big mess, it won't magically happen.

While many are complaining about how we are shipping goals, what about what we are creating in attack? Over 80 percent of our goals so far this season have come from either set-pieces or unforgivable errors by the opposition. We just cannot create enough clear-cut chances to score goals.

But the interesting thing is, it didn't start this season. For so long, it's been a problem. Since JM returned. Too many times we struggled to open up teams that were resolute at the back.

The philosophy has always remained questionable. If your first approach to winning a game is preventing the opposition from scoring, then some day, when the defensive unit is faulty, you will struggle to score goals. Because the 'method of attack' has always been weak.

JM cannot fix this. It is beyond him. Because the very solution to the problem is fundamentally in contrast to his philosophy of the game.

It's time for a change. This is an operational/tactical blunder allowed to carry on for so long, the effects are now manifesting in manner of an insurmountable mental uphill.

It's time to make a change. Because although it sounds implausible right now to many, we could very well be in a relegation battle very soon. There is bad blood and total disrespect for JM's approach from everyone - players, team medics, FA, referees and the media.

coogar:


not all EPL fans, abeg....

it's baffling that chelsea fans are moaning about being unlucky? luck? what has luck gotta do with football? they were well beaten by barcelona in 2009. luck didn't score that goal for iniesta. messi teed him with a delicious pass & iniesta finished with aplomb.

in the other semis, they lost twice to liverpool. the ghost goal incident is a poor excuse. without the ghost goal, chelsea must score to advance to the final. they didn't score in 180 mins of the semis. what is unlucky about a team that failed to score a goal in both legs of a semifinal tie?

StarBoard:

And Michael Ballack evaded the ball from Iniesta instead of taking the block to the body.
These peeps funny die.
Luck my a$$.

barackohandso:

Now this is an objective epl fan
Cc: adelana1 mourinholic leyqute

coogar:


don't mind these rats......
talking about luck as if they cannot produce a messi or an iniesta from their youth academy. they knew what they were against before the ball was kicked so wetin

StarBoard:


Shekpe logic as peddled by fans on this thread:

a 10 man Barca were lucky to eliminate Chelsea despite having more attempts and possession.

It gets better.

They were lucky Barca only got a draw. This revisionism is getting ridiculous.

barackohandso:



Now this is an objective epl fan

Cc: adelana1 mourinholic leyqute

dopeJemi:


Anything that goes against your opinion is subjective but if it is in line with your opinion it is objective... Hmmm

coogar:


they would also argue that they were unlucky against a 10-man PSG last season.

barackohandso:



Not if it's the truth.

They were clearly making barca look like the bad guys

ollah1:


What do you mean except barca? in 2009, Abidal got an undeserved straight red card in the first leg. Against inter, they scored an offside goal to make the score line 2 - 1 in a semi final match. Against United, Rooney scored an office goal to level scores in a final match. What would you say about these?

codedguy1:
Mourinho is a bloody coward! He is trying hard to get himself fired because he knows no matter what he says or does now, IF he eventually gets fired he will get a job sooner than we all think.

Abrahamovic should not sack him, let him prove to us all that he is truly the special one. Now is the time to re emphasis his status as a special coach/Manager.


He is looking for the easy way out.

All these being unlucky is just lame.

barackohandso:



Taking a 2-goal lead, having a man advantage, messi losing a PK, ball hitting the bar twice


And still ended up not making the final. If you don't consider these points unlucky but you tag Chelsea unlucky vs barca in 2009, then i'll just take it you were trolling

barackohandso:



Funny thing is they won't remember the ones that went against Barca. When people refer to the 2009 semis it's always the penalty calls Chelsea didn't get people remember, they forget barca had abidal wrongly sent off

Chestar5:


dont mind dat man


he is using mind tricks for chelsea, he doesnt want to resign, he wants to get fired but i hope he wont get wat he wants

coogar:

the ghost goal incident is a poor excuse. without the ghost goal, chelsea must score to advance to the final. they didn't score in 180 mins of the semis. what is unlucky about a team that failed to score a goal in both legs of a semifinal tie?

coogar:


not all EPL fans, abeg....

it's baffling that chelsea fans are moaning about being unlucky? luck? what has luck gotta do with football? they were well beaten by barcelona in 2009. luck didn't score that goal for iniesta. messi teed him with a delicious pass & iniesta finished with aplomb.

in the other semis, they lost twice to liverpool. the ghost goal incident is a poor excuse. without the ghost goal, chelsea must score to advance to the final. they didn't score in 180 mins of the semis. what is unlucky about a team that failed to score a goal in both legs of a semifinal tie?

coogar:


don't mind these rats......
talking about luck as if they cannot produce a messi or an iniesta from their youth academy. they knew what they were against before the ball was kicked so wetin be luck?

barca were very average that day but they kept plugging away looking for that opening for the 2 magicians to create something. iniesta's shot from outside the box went past cech & people are blaming it on luck. luck?? was the shot deflected by multiple players before it got to the net?




i don't have to be objective to say the truth. chelsea were well beaten on the night. they rested their laurels after essien's thunder strike. they wanted to sit on their lead & it came back to bite them in the bütt!