BikeMan:
I just want to understand why Neymar is running back to Barca. Why not United? Why not Bayern?

I stand with my words, let this guy play with dem Bakayokos and Alonso for just two seasons and let's see how it goes

He is a coward

Chelsea linked to Marcos Rojo
wow good news

If not for the ban, what did Kovacic really do exceptionally, while on loan with us?

airmark:
If not for the ban, what did Kovacic really did exceptionally, while on loan with us?

I'm forced to ask how you rate players, who in our midfield performed closed to him in our midfield with exception to the two assured starters ginho and Kante?
RLC had a late surge

Well you once rated Coquelin and krychowiak abi kini spelling self. All is well

Kovacic is not a bad signing.

airmark:
If not for the ban, what did Kovacic really did exceptionally, while on loan with us?

He is good

Omo this news about brazilian presidential escort moving mad weight inside fighter jet, is hitting me a bit different.

39 keys of cocaina?

39 bricks?!

Hes not a businessman, he's a business...maaan, abeg let him be about his business, damn!

nihilistjnr:
Omo this news about brazilian presidential escort moving mad weight inside fighter jet, is hitting me a bit different.

39 keys of cocaina?

39 bricks?!

Hes not a businessman, he's a business...maaan, abeg let him be about his business, damn!

lol.

Mad weights and exbits are moved through private and executive couriers,jets and convoys..

If u know u know

krattoss:
lol.

Mad weights and exbits are moved through private and executive couriers,jets and convoys..

If u know u know

First time since babangida that I'm hearing Head of States moving like El Chapo.

You just can't trust a Latino. The one suffering from headache will go to hospital today and die tommorow because he prefers to sell the drugs they gave him to treat himself.

If PSG were in Chelsea's shoe, they'd find a way around it just like they did with the Mbappe deal. One year loan with compulsory option to buy afterwards. We all know PSG had that deal sorted behind the scenes. Chelsea should do same. I want all the top teams ready for next season, City and Liverpool need competition.

patrickmuf:
If PSG were in Chelsea's shoe, they'd find a way around it just like they did with the Mbappe deal. One year loan with compulsory option to buy afterwards. We all know PSG had that deal sorted behind the scenes. Chelsea should do same. I want all the top teams ready for next season, City and Liverpool need competition.

No they wouldn't. The ban is on player registrations. Loan players need to be registered

MercylessMercy:


I'm forced to ask how you rate players, who in our midfield performed closed to him in our midfield with exception to the two assured starters ginho and Kante?
RLC had a late surge

Well you once rated Coquelin and krychowiak abi kini spelling self. All is well

You forgot to add Van dijk, Koulibaly, Hazard to the list of those I rated and flopped now.

I asked what spectacular thing did he bring to the team last season? If not for the ban, he shouldn't have been signed.

I hope Lampard gives Mount, Rlc enough chance in the team and not consider the amount spent on Kovacic, to deny those guys the chance to prove themselves.

Prime Kovacic has gone, Madrid keep sending us grade b products.

Unlimited22:

He is good

Once our attackers are checked, can he pull a Lampard for us? I will rather use my first season to give Mount and Rlc that chance. We shouldn't only rely on our attackers to score goals or assist.

airmark:
Wow, Kovacic

This is the type of player from Madrid that i believe will help the team. I remember how he destroyed Busquets last season.

@ hensben, this was me before last season started, hoping to see the Kovacic I knew back then. He didn't play anything for us if you actually watched him when he was useful for Madrid.

Transfer ban forced our hands, period.

Ibime:


No they wouldn't. The ban is on player registrations. Loan players need to be registered

He doesn't know.. We are caged in the transfer window

Ibime:


No they wouldn't. The ban is on player registrations. Loan players need to be registered

Okay, so how about Kovacic's case? Or was they a deal already in place?

patrickmuf:
Okay, so how about Kovacic's case? Or was they a deal already in place?

Kovacic is already registered on his current loan deal

airmark:


@ hensben, this was me before last season started, hoping to see the Kovacic I knew back then. He didn't play anything for us if you actually watched him when he was useful for Madrid.

Transfer ban forced our hands, period.

One question, was he played in his position?

airmark:


Once our attackers are checked, can he pull a Lampard for us? I will rather use my first season to give Mount and Rlc that chance. We shouldn't only rely on our attackers to score goals or assist.

I'm with you on this, this is the same thing I was telling someone yesterday... 50m on a midfielder that doesn't score goals is a no no for me when we already have non-scoring midfielders in Kante and ginho in the same midfield

Ibime:


Kovacic is already registered on his current loan deal

Okay, thanks.

emmy2807:

I agree with the point you raised, but not everything has to be attacked from a gender perspective, business wise, i make more money, i get more. I cited nigerian league wages and european league wages to buttress that point.
And moreover the article wasnt referring to american football, as messi's 84 million per year was used in comparison to the female highest paid.

My brother i tire oh,that is how one of my coursemates asked me to come amd sign a petition that will stop employers from "forcing models to lose weight"

airmark:


@ hensben, this was me before last season started, hoping to see the Kovacic I knew back then. He didn't play anything for us if you actually watched him when he was useful for Madrid.

Transfer ban forced our hands, period.

I understand transfer ban forced us to sign him but let’s give him a chance with another manager with new tactics and formation. It maybe sarri style of football doesn’t suit him since you said he flourished while in Madrid.

airmark:


You forgot to add Van dijk, Koulibaly, Hazard to the list of those I rated and flopped now.

I asked what spectacular thing did he bring to the team last season? If not for the ban, he shouldn't have been signed.

I hope Lampard gives Mount, Rlc enough chance in the team and not consider the amount spent on Kovacic, to deny those guys the chance to prove themselves.

Prime Kovacic has gone, Madrid keep sending us grade b products.

€45M looks to be a hefty figure for a player who was unable to score in 51 appearances last term, but Real Madrid aren’t entirely content with what they’ll be paid.


seems Madrid thinks differently about Kovacic. Honestly at Madrid there are only 3, maybe 4 midfielders better than him, Modric, Kroos, Casemiro, and maybe Isco or James or Cebellos.

airmark:


Once our attackers are checked, can he pull a Lampard for us? I will rather use my first season to give Mount and Rlc that chance. We shouldn't only rely on our attackers to score goals or assist.

I agree but giving that Kovacic can play deeper than the both(n it may also let Bakayoko leave). The signing has its pecks, he dribbles too, so he will pull an iniesta for us

obainojazz:
One question, was he played in his position?

yes na, is it not Left Central Midfield (LCM)

hensben:
I understand transfer ban forced us to sign him but let’s give him a chance with another manager with new tactics and formation. It maybe sarri style of football doesn’t suit him since you said he flourished while in Madrid.

please I have never known Kovacic to score goals o.. even Zielinski we wanted to buy last season, Napoli quoting 60m or so, scores goals in that Sarri setup, if Hamsik didn't play.

Kovacic won't shoot, he will pass the bloodly ball.

Even Pulisic hasnt yet shown to be a natural goal getter or scorer. so next season will be more of a team effort to score even one goal a game.

No team has effectively survived losing a goal scorer, not Tottenham when they lost Bale, not Liverpool with Suarez, no Monaco with Mbappe, even Madrid with Ronaldo. Even when they could replace them, they had a miserable next season.(Except Napoli who lost Higuain n did better the next season.)

If Chelsea finish 6th Lampard should not be sacked. simple.

MercylessMercy:


I'm forced to ask how you rate players, who in our midfield performed closed to him in our midfield with exception to the two assured starters ginho and Kante?
RLC had a late surge

Well you once rated Coquelin and krychowiak abi kini spelling self. All is well

he is the head of airmark citadel of football knowledge. Always asking yeye questions

airmark:


Once our attackers are checked, can he pull a Lampard for us? I will rather use my first season to give Mount and Rlc that chance. We shouldn't only rely on our attackers to score goals or assist.

how many goals and assist did the prime kovacic you knew in Madrid averaging every season??

HOMOTOYOSI10:

I'm with you on this, this is the same thing I was telling someone yesterday... 50m on a midfielder that doesn't score goals is a no no for me when we already have non-scoring midfielders in Kante and ginho in the same midfield

It's worrying to say the least.

lordfalcao:
how many goals and assist did the prime kovacic you knew in Madrid averaging every season??

Ask your mentor to calculate the stats per minute for you, if you are too dull to do it.