anonimi:


now wey fight don reach intense level we dey hear "na look una dey look us? abeg i no wan fight (insult) anymore"
BTW, one of the opposites (antonyms) of free is enslaved. QED

precap2:


This endless wrangling sef. I don tire

Holla me!

e be like sey me sef go form my church start dey scam people as i see sey i don sabi dey make prophecy wey dey come true sharp, sharp

tyson55:

@tudor
I 'm very much in line with you, and you seems to be reasonable on your postings. Keep it up!

This iz my earnest prayer 4 u. may the love ov God b with u all day through with hiz endless, boundless grace may he richly bless ur life with much happiness & success. happy Sunday!

first and foremost, it is not right for an unbeliever to donate money (store treasures) where he won’t go to (heaven). however, if he insists, why rebuke? afterall, the righteous shall eat the fruit of the wicked and they shall inherit the land.

NOIBMUUL:

first and foremost, it is not right for an unbeliever to donate money (store treasures) where he won’t go to (heaven). however, if he insists, why rebuke? afterall, the righteous shall eat the fruit of the wicked and they shall inherit the land.

what is the reference from the Bible for this passage?
and would you mind stating who the righteous is here?
as well as the biblical basis of confirming righteousness on that person, organisation or institution?

anonimi:

and would you mind stating who the righteous is here?
as well as the biblical basis of confirming righteousness on that person, organisation or institution?

What you're asking for is to simply reinforce your personal bias. No human can prove any verbal demand conclusively. For anything that has to do with another human you're only left with conjectures:

1. Obama is a good president (Dems), Obama is a bad president (Repubs)
2. Angela Merckel is a good Chancellor (Chris Dem), no she knows nothing (Libs)
3. Pst Chris Oyakhilome is a man of God (CE members), No he's not (Catholic and muslims)
4 Jega will be a good INEC chairman (Conservatives), no he won't be (Lib and Prog)

The same reason that is used to prove one good, right, true are also used to prove them the other way around. Proof is nothing but alignment of words in the way that pleases your preconceptions and prejudices. So no one will prove nothing to you.

Holla moi!

precap2:

What you're asking for is to simply reinforce your personal bias. No human can prove any verbal demand conclusively. For anything that has to do with another human you're only left with conjectures:

1. Obama is a good president (Dems), Obama is a bad president (Repubs)
2. Angela Merckel is a good Chancellor (Chris Dem), no she knows nothing (Libs)
3. Pst Chris Oyakhilome is a man of God (CE members), No he's not (Catholic and muslims)
4 Jega will be a good INEC chairman (Conservatives), no he won't be (Lib and Prog)

The same reason that is used to prove one good, right, true are also used to prove them the other way around. Proof is nothing but alignment of words in the way that pleases your preconceptions and prejudices. So no one will prove nothing to you.

Holla moi!

Is that what the bible teaches Christians (followers of Christ) vis-a-vis teh issue of righteousness?
BTW, where was I asking for "proof"
why would you try to twist my post and put in meanings that are not stated nor implied?
What is your interest/gain?

anonimi:

BTW, where was I asking for "proof"

anonimi:

and would you mind stating who the righteous is here?
as well as the biblical basis of confirming righteousness on that person, organisation or institution?

Maybe it's grammar that is at stake here. If you don't know you wrote this, then move up and read again. If you know you wrote it, then words are the only trouble in understanding here. What were you seeking in the statement above?

Holla moi!

precap2:

Maybe it's grammar that is at stake here. If you don't know you wrote this, then move up and read again. If you know you wrote it, then words are the only trouble in understanding here. What were you seeking in the statement above?

Holla moi!

the biblical basis for the assertion made. QED.

Baslome, what do call the jet.

Whom do U think God is,

U say God's jet. What does God needs man jet to do, is it to travel or what.

Why do you attach that wonderful name of God to men's atrocities.

How many jet did Jesus has when he came to earth. He performd miracles that people saw and witnessed.

They use offering to build a university that ordinary member of their church/ payer of tithe can not send their children to.

Why then do you blame politicians; they are far better than so call man of God.

Let us think of God's Kingdom not this wicked world where we are going to spend 70/80 years.

It is not the responsibility of the church to return such money. If such a thing is allowed , Satan will use it as attack against churches. He will just get his guys to donate into a church project with the intention of getting the church indebted. After the money might have been used for tv broadcast or building project, the church may go bankrupt because it is satanic set up. What happens to criminal that gives money to orphanage. Will the orphan pay back. What happens to the money the criminal spent in beer parlour, taxi, airplane, or hotel who pays back? Taxi driver?. No of course! Thesame way, the church can not be made to pay back such money. In the first place the church did not know the source , and the church has no way of finding out the source of such money. So abusing pastors and G.Os is not the issue. If the church has to pay back, then several people will pay back too; from taxi driver to food seller.

Pastor AIO,

Deuteronomy 23:18
18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a LovePeddler, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord thy God for any vow: for even both these[ are] abomination unto the LORD thy God.

I agree with you. But A pastor has no way of determining the source of an offering or donation. Jesus did not ask where Mary Madgalene God the money for the perfume she poured on him. Even though tradition says she was a LovePeddler

^^^
Stop lying the bible never described Mary magdalene as a LovePeddler so stop tring to mis-lead people here in your desperation to defend your love for filthy lucre.

Joagbaje:

It is not the responsibility of the church to return such money. If such a thing is allowed , Satan will use it as attack against churches. He will just get his guys to donate into a church project with the intention of getting the church indebted. After the money might have been used for tv broadcast or building project, the church may go bankrupt because it is satanic set up. What happens to criminal that gives money to orphanage. Will the orphan pay back. What happens to the money the criminal spent in beer parlour, taxi, airplane, or hotel who pays back? Taxi driver?. No of course! Thesame way, the church can not be made to pay back such money. In the first place the church did not know the source , and the church has no way of finding out the source of such money. So abusing pastors and G.Os is not the issue. If the church has to pay back, then several people will pay back too; from taxi driver to food seller.

no offense you are talking rubbish.
President obama returned campaign donations made by an associate after allegations of wrong doings were made public. He wasnt running around and squirming to hold on to stolen funds like you greedy folks.
Geez obama must be from planet jupiter.

Kunleoshob

KunleOshob:

^^^
Stop lying the bible never described Mary magdalene as a LovePeddler so stop tring to mis-lead people here in your desperation to defend your love for filthy lucre.

Luke 7:37 (kjv)
37 And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that[ Jesus] sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment,

Why did jesus not return the perfume which she bought with questionable money and which was abomination according to the law?

Luke 7:37
37 a woman of the streets-- a love-peddler-- heard he was there and brought an exquisite flask filled with expensive perfume

Pst Chris Oyakhilome is a man of God (CE members), No he's not (Catholic and muslims)

precap 2 is the most stupid poster on NL,you mean to tell me that only catholics and muslims oppose Pastor Chris?most of the pastor chris attackers on this website are not catholics nor muslims,they even come from your fellow penterascal movement.Do you mean to tell me that the PFN (which blacklisted him) and chris okotie are also catholics and muslims abi

If d so called "man of God" cannot decern a stolen money frm d thieves,devil,& claim it for God without God kicking agst such lies & blaspemy but kept silence then something is morally wrong with d whiteman's religion.

A LARGE NO OF CHRISTIANS ARE FOOLISH AND STUPID, THEY THING BY CAN BRIBE GOD WITH MONEY AND BY DEFENDING THEIR STUPID PROTESTANT DAD AND MUM G O THEIR WILL MAKE HEAVEN, NONSENSE, FOOLISH PASTORS FOOLISH FELLOWER


Deuteronomy 23:18 18 Thou shalt not bring the hire of a LovePeddler, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord thy God for any
vow: for even both these[ are] abomination unto the LORD
thy God. I agree with you. But A pastor has no way of determining the
source of an offering or donation. Jesus did not ask where
Mary Madgalene God the money for the perfume she poured
on him. Even though tradition says she was a LovePeddler

The pastor has bought a befitting private jet with the loot.

Earthly Enjoyment pastor.