Unlimited22:

The two of your are somewhat correct

The only goal there that Alisson may not have conceded was the first, where Adrian gave the ball away.

But VVD is also somewhat overrated, mostly by silly Liverpool fans.

timbros:


Fact remains that Liverpool with Alisson, without VVD never conceded 7 goals BUT Liverpool with VVD, without Alisson conceded 7.

nateevs:
Barkley. Always making wrong decisions.

timbros:
Gentlemen, can we now agree that Alisson is more crucial to Liverpool's defence strategy than the traffic warden?

Cc airmark raumdeuter

airmark:


I don't want to believe you watch your matches on livescore.com.

Unlimited22:

Unarguable.
But VVD has kept clean sheets and won games without Alisson too.

[They're both essential.

BlueAngel444:
Players that could still leave Chelsea
one of Emerson/Alonso
Rudiger
Sarr
Ruben Cheek

Players that could join
None
Said Berahma
Rice

Players bought
Thiago 0m
Sarr 0m
Ziyech 33m
Werner 47m
Chilwell 45m
Havertz 62m
Mendy 22m

Total £210m

timbros:


Maybe I do.

And livescore told me that a VVD led Liverpool defence conceded 7 goals in the absence of Alisson.

Is that true?

Nikiballer:
Banter will surely go round this season cos lots of L's go show but no come dey tell us say we no make sense or come dey shalaye trolling to us

BlueAngel444:
eh even Alison would have conceded at least 5 of those goals

airmark:


He is pained that we have binned his Rudiger and he has no option than to drag VVD.

Like 5 of those goals had nothing to do with VVD but Timbros only saw result on livescore and VVD must be blamed.

Ramos had led a defence that conceded 6 goals at home before, likewise Maldini.

Timbros is a lowkey Scummy.

BlueAngel444:
Players that could still leave Chelsea
one of Emerson/Alonso
Rudiger
Sarr
Ruben Cheek

Players that could join
None
Said Berahma
Rice

Players bought
Thiago 0m
Sarr 0m
Ziyech 33m
Werner 47m
Chilwell 45m
Havertz 62m
Mendy 22m

Total £210m

Unlimited22:
This Gilmour injury shaa. Very horrible timing


We still need a DM because if Kante gets injured, wahala dey

Amoto94:
Liverpool are the first reigning English top-flight champions to ship seven goals in a league match since Arsenal against Sunderland in September 1953.
If they ever compare Terry with that traffic warden at Melwood Park again

popizaino:


Greatihx
Natevs

You both have a mail sir .

2emotional:
thank you our resident accountant.... Oya give us apariola's account shapperly

airmark:


He is pained that we have binned his Rudiger and he has no option than to drag VVD.

Like 5 of those goals had nothing to do with VVD but Timbros only saw result on livescore and VVD must be blamed.

Ramos had led a defence that conceded 6 goals at home before, likewise Maldini.

Timbros is a lowkey Scummy.

OJURONGBE1:



3 African nations yearly budget spent

BlueAngel444:
Players that could still leave Chelsea
one of Emerson/Alonso
Rudiger
Sarr
Ruben Cheek

Players that could join
None
Said Berahma
Rice

Players bought
Thiago 0m
Sarr 0m
Ziyech 33m
Werner 47m
Chilwell 45m
Havertz 62m
Mendy 22m

Total £210m

macjireh:

no wahala there...worst case,,we bring in a CB,,thiago may be used at least to sit down at DM

seankafor:
what is happening to Vic Moses

ShitStain:


Drinkwater nko?
Our greatest ever flop

macjireh:

no wahala there...worst case,,we bring in a CB,,thiago may be used at least to sit down at DM

Unlimited22:


But VVD is also somewhat overrated, mostly by silly Liverpool fans.

timbros:
Gentlemen, can we now agree that Alisson is more crucial to Liverpool's defence strategy than the traffic warden?

Cc airmark ramdeuter

Unlimited22:

Unarguable.
But VVD has kept clean sheets and won games without Alisson too.

They're both essential.

timbros:


@bolded: double standards.

When Gomez was making xx number of tackles/interceptions and Alisson was making xx amount of saves to help Liverpool keep clean sheets, it was "a VVD led Liverpool" that won the match with clean sheet. But now that Liverpool swallowed 7 goals, you are trying to exonerate VVD. Shouldn't it be "a VVD led Liverpool" that conceded 7 goals?

Did Ramos and Maldini concede 7 goals to an equivalent of Aston Villa?

timbros:


@bolded: double standards.

When Gomez was making xx number of tackles/interceptions and Alisson was making xx amount of saves to help Liverpool keep clean sheets, it was "a VVD led Liverpool" that won the match with clean sheet. But now that Liverpool swallowed 7 goals, you are trying to exonerate VVD. Shouldn't it be "a VVD led Liverpool" that conceded 7 goals?

Did Ramos and Maldini concede 7 goals to an equivalent of Aston Villa?