dare2think:


Dude, STFU.

Perhaps you should read your earlier post again, you sounded like an Arsenal fan trying to downgrade a very successfully display by comparing us to 'stoke' and saying it was not a 'spectacle'.
What else do you want? To Play spectacular and to lose?
A season where everyone underestimated the team, yet they still won two finals.
'It defies all odds that we won the CL. We shouldn't (and I am not ashamed to say that) but we did'.

^ What kind of fan says the above? We shouldn't?
I repeat, why dont you take the cup and give it to a spectacular team since you imply that we shouldn't have won it!

A season where everyone underestimated the team, yet they still won two finals.

nateevs:
In your wisdom please explain how all this don't defy all odds. Coming here talking bollocks. If you cannot stand the truth, go electrocute yourself.

medjai: Drogba's a fuckin boss. Damn!

Congrats Chelsea, most undeserved CL winners in history

nateevs:


Bluediva just enjoy the moment and do not overstate it.
We won on penalties and were worse than Stoke in the 120mins.

I'ld appreciate you saying we'll take the win as it's wrtten in history forever.
It was hardly a spectacle upon which the future can built.

Let's always maintain perspective when stating things.
When the euphoria of victory wears, we'll take stock and make sound decisions.

Ibime:
I text him back to say that Mikel has not learned anything new as he is in his 30's and has always been composed on the ball except that he gets exposed with high-line like in the regime of Scolari, Ancelotti and AVB


Nateevs, you need to have a look in the mirror mate. AVB's "trash old players" have sealed their legacy. We did hold 45% possession, but could not take the handbrake off to attack fully because Bertrand and Kalou could not build up the plays with the boys and it would be foolhardy to commit all out with inferior firepower, only to get suckerpunched on the counter especially with Mikel not being fast enough to chase Bayerns forwards back. The decision to play Bertrand was the only tactical flaw Ive seen RDM make so far, and it stifled our ability to build attacks, but one thing is for sure - that Mikel and Lamps more than held their own in that midfield.

Ibime: ^^^Mikel was fantastic. Im saying its nothing new with Mikel neither has he learned it recently. If you think this is Mikels best game, you must be mistaken. You must have forgotten how Mikel bossed Scholes in FA Cup final (2007 I think). I always considered Mikel to be the best protector of the ball in the Prem. The problem with Mikel is always being exposed with pace through the middle if Chelsea play with "high blocks" like AVB, Scolari and Ancelotti were often wont to do.

nateevs:
I still believe Gerrard is/was better than Lampard. Nothing can change my opinion on that.
Your friend should be ashamed of himself by thinking Lamps is better than Gerrard of the basis of a better half-turn ability. Gerrard's ability has fast faded in his memories because he (Gerrard) has been plagued by injuries. How can some think think player A is better than B because of one single ability? Do you know how many thing Gerrard can do Lamps cannot dream about doing?

nateevs:
As to the statement "RDM has completed the project in 3 months!!!", you will find pal that this is your opinion about "the project" - winning the CL. My opinion about this project was a complete overhaul and change in philosophy and direction of the club. Change in transfer policy, playing style, improving the club's image, trusting in young players, overhaul of the scouting network and reduction of the overall wage bill in a bid to building an outfit that out-lives its owner. That's why AVB said it will take 3 years. Are you by any means suggesting RDM has achieved all this?

Ibime:

Nateevs,

I have no more words to share with you on this issue. You have been disgraced too many times. The same season when you fought with me claiming Lamps is useless is the same season he obliterated the rules on midfield offensive play by copping 27 goals and 20 assists.

Now he is providing evidence to you guys who claimed he only did such and such because two guys were behind protecting him by playing the protection role as good as anyone who ever played behind him, whilst delivering composed passes, half-turns away from packed midfield and solid tackles and covering. Mind you, this is a 34 year old man.
D

coogar:

this is cheap escapism.
if we are going to be using lampard's age to excuse his poor general
performance then he should retire.

debosky:
It may not fit with your purist view of how Chelski should play, but the time for such talk is not while basking in the euphoria of such an epic victory.

dare2think: ^^^^^

Much respect my homie, I'm sorry for my uncouth language and demeanour!

Love Chelsea to bit and am sure you feel the same!

I'll delete my rude posts as soon as I'm less busy!

Sorry Once again!