Olavic001:

Accepting is of no consequence, I'm just following your logic.

Then it is a waste of time time to continue to engage you in any reasonable convo

The simple fact is that the idiot is not referring to our GOD, maybe some other gods he has conjured in his demented mind! Nobody dares speak profanity to our GOD-The Imperium in Imperio! The Creator of Heaven and Earth! The Great Custodian of Infinite Wisdom an!d Knowledge!

The Bible says a fool says there is no God. This man obviously does not believe in God. Thus, the scrawny president is simply a fool. Pointblank. Period!

Great talk!

anthony533:
I think the President is kind of confused.

Though there are many gods and I know he is not referring to the God who created the heaven and earth.

He is referring to the god he believes in.

My opinion though...

rhektor:


Then it is a waste of time time to continue to engage you in any reasonable convo

Oh oh... You want me to accept something I have issue with the way you arrived at it [logic]... I'm telling you a lot of people have tried to use cause and effect argument, it always fails at the 2nd cause!....

Olavic001:

Oh oh... You want me to accept something I have issue with the way you arrived at it [logic]... I'm telling you a lot of people have tried to use cause and effect argument, it always fails at the 2nd cause!....

Using cause and effect, you accepted that there is a creator for everything but your problem is the cause of the first cause. God is the cause of everything you know and don't know, things you see and don't see. If you have accepted the first cause then stop disturbing yourself about what cause the first cause because if you are asking who writes a book and the name of the writer has been provided what else would you want?

rhektor:


Using cause and effect, you accepted that there is a creator for everything but your problem is the cause of the first cause. God is the cause of everything you know and don't know, things you see and don't see. If you have accepted the first cause then stop disturbing yourself about what cause the first cause because if you are asking who writes a book and the name of the writer has been provided what else would you want?

rhektor:


Using cause and effect, you accepted that there is a creator for everything but your problem is the cause of the first cause. God is the cause of everything you know and don't know, things you see and don't see. If you have accepted the first cause then stop disturbing yourself about what cause the first cause because if you are asking who writes a book and the name of the writer has been provided what else would you want?

Really, you follow the logic you are using to prove something to the extent that's comfortable for you. It doesn't work like that, you don't drop logic, it creates a flawed way of thinking and makes everything you prove, wrong. You aren't finding the truth but creating your own truth............... And on your book analogy, the writer name provided inside the book is not always the real name of the writer. Wrong hypothesis.

Olavic001:

Really, you follow the logic you are using to prove something to the extent that's comfortable for you. It doesn't work like that, you don't drop logic, it creates a flawed way of thinking and makes everything you prove, wrong. You aren't finding the truth but creating your own truth............... And on your book analogy, the writer name provided inside the book is not always the real name of the writer. Wrong hypothesis.

Now you are the one creating your own truth as it against the universally acceptable truth. If the man die was written by Wole Soyinka, Things fall apart written by Chinua Achebe, How to win friends and influence people is written be Dale Canergie. However you coming here to change the truth means truth has a different meaning to you. I can only conclude that whatever suits you is ragarded as truth by you and whatever doesn't suit you is not true.

This discussion is beyond you please spare me the mention

rhektor:


Now you are the one creating your own truth as it against the universally acceptable truth. If the man die was written by Wole Soyinka, Things fall apart written by Chinua Achebe, How to win friends and influence people is written be Dale Canergie. However you coming here to change the truth means truth has a different meaning to you. I can only conclude that whatever suits you is ragarded as truth by you and whatever doesn't suit you is not true.

This discussion is beyond you please spare me the mention

Really, you have never heard of pen_name[ such as; Robin hobb, Shakespeare, George Orwell ] ..... Goggle Search the term.... Maybe you might reconsider your opinion.

Olavic001:

Really, you have never heard of pen_name[ such as; Robin hobb, Shakespeare, George Orwell ] ..... Goggle Search the term.... Maybe you might reconsider your opinion.

You're just delusional

stefanbanach:
Sahih Bukhari 5.236.
Narrated Hisham's father:
Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed there for two years or so and then he married 'Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consumed that marriage when she was nine years old.

Thanks for the research. You should know that in the era of Prohpet Muhamad age is not the standard measurement of marriage. It's indeed illogical to use age as a standard measurement when sometimes the stature, maturity and physicality of a 15 year old is more than that of 20 year old.

In his era, physicality and maturity grows faster than age. Hence, age was (is) just a number.

For women, after their first mensruation the second one will be in their husband's house to prevent immorality. Even the practice was still active in the days of our fore fathers before the advent of colonialism.

Foolish man

brixton:
Sometimes you wonder at God’s patience, this man would have been dead instead of my mom or siblings.

Eeyaa.....take heart man. The president sounds a bit troubled though.