budaatum:


Amazing evidence, triple. They must voice their opinion but they must not read it, lol.

I've given your unconscious something below to help unconscious you become conscious. I know it will fail though despite its trying but I do admire its effort.

triplechoice:
But after investigating the group ,I knew it would be wasting my time . Ex members of the cult of confirmed that too .
They say Amorc is an expensive waste of time.

triplechoice:


Stop quoting the Bible you hypocrite and pretender .Stick to your Amorc

budaatum:


Amazing evidence, triple. They must voice their opinion but they must not read it, lol.

I've given your unconscious something below to help unconscious you become conscious. I know it will fail though despite its trying but I do admire its effort.

budaatum:


I quote whatever I want triple and those with eyes see.

triplechoice:


See how you trying to deceive yourself up there .

You mentioned opinion without specifying what kind .

budaatum:


Triple. Can all that you've been posting that buda has posted not be so that people here do not waste their time and money and just learn as much about it as they can here for free? It's not as if I have asked anyone to join being not a member myself, though I see some merit in some of its teaching.

How much time and money one spends investigating things depends on how much time and money one can afford, and I have quite a bit of both so can study them much deeply than the Facebook that is your evidence, triple.

And on that note, some more cult with apologies they are not audio. Bet you understand their so called cult nature makes their free availability a just delight though.

https://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/ros/index.htm

budaatum:


So, they can voice an opinion of a specific kind?

Tell, triple. What kind of opinion can a Rosicrucian give about Rosicrucianism? Educate me please.

triplechoice:


I don't think so .But I suspect he might still be reading comments anonymously .

Maynmann:
Occultic people are important, if there is nothing to cover, there’s nothing to uncover

budaatum:

Let me tell you a story.

Ma met da while studying nursing and he law. He was the Rosicrucian and he paid subs, got the magazines and all the books too. The magazines were full of Ancient Egypt and Greece, least the pictures I was looking at were, and da used to spend hours reading them. And guess who he got the money from? Ma. Since she was getting paid to study nursing and he was paying for law. They separated eventually. Ma's "show me" just didn't rank well with da's "believe me it's true", especially considering the financial outflow with no financial return and 5 kids to feed.

Maynmann:
Occultic people are important, if there is nothing to cover, there’s nothing to uncover

triplechoice:


Not when they are trying to steal the minds of others and turn them into zombies like yourself .

If you have nothing to hide then reveal your initiation secrets right away or you shut up.

triplechoice:


What must they not read and what opinion they must not voiced are not the same thing .

budaatum:



Triple says buda is cult and is doing witchcraft and A001 seems to agree. What you think?

Maynmann:

No one can steal anyone’s mind, they will have to steal their own first.
What does “zombie” really mean.

What’s secret and what’s open is the same thing, you can’t have one without the other.

Let’s just keep acting. You are doing a good job though.

budaatum:


I must agree that triple is doing a fantastically good job though he is wrong.

Maynmann:

What do they mean by “cult” and “witchcraft”.
Bud, I mean witchcraft is a craft 😂

budaatum:


Knew your presence would add value.

Maynmann:

It’s part of the play.

budaatum:


See you on stage or take a seat.

budaatum:
The below triple, is from here, and is for your unconscious and your consciousness cooperating together to extract some objective reasoning from and present to your subjective unconscious so that conscious you may become objectively aware.

We'll call it mud, for now.

triplechoice:



Don't read books critical of Amorc .

Maynmann:

Not really, I’m also acting.

budaatum:


What you observe might appear to you as a play, Mayn, but I am not acting.

But why would you suppose your own subjective opinion and view of what you observe must apply to others, I wonder.

Are you unaware of the subjectivity of relativity or is this play you act in accelerating in non-inertial reference frames.

triplechoice:


You cannot not teach me anything .

You don't know the difference between two unlike statements .

Don't read books critical of Amorc .

If someone says something negative about Amorc you must not remain silent. Voice your opinion against it.

How is the above statements contradictory ?

Mr using your senses who doesn't know how to use his own

Maynmann:


Bud, in your occult, what did they teach you about the “soul”?

Maynmann:

Amorc is an occultic society, that is fact, they worship gods, duotheism, polytheism, netjer, just like other theists, it really means Nothing, we are all acting.
You can even see their splinter cells in wiccan and thelema.

budaatum:


I am not in an occult mayn, so wasn't taught anything about the soul by a cult. Sorry.

triplechoice:


And the hypocrite go about calling others who do the same thing like him ,foolish believers who cannot use their senses .

His own is even worse . He believes Harvey Spenser Lewis the con -man who founded the cult is part of the great white brotherhood , the Amorc egregore that protects him from demons and what not .

I have forced him out to defend his beliefs he has been hiding .

He is unable to make sense ever since and just babbling incoherently like a baby or a theif caught red handed .

budaatum:


Sounds like what a Christian, and a Muslim, and even an atheist or an Igbo or Yoruba or anyone with a brain would do, to me.

If you talk negative about Christianity or Islam, or Yoruba's or atheist or buda, of course Christians and Moslems and Yorubas and atheist and buda and those with positive opinions would voice their opinions, don't you think. You have a negative opinion of buda and here you are voicing it, which is very natural, and welcome, and I am voicing my counter opinion as you can very well see.

Also note that voicing stupid subjective ignorant anecdotal opinions that lack evidence might also attract opinions, and one might be wise not to mistake them for the former.